[Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] Where 2.0 brainstorming

[Michael P. Gerlek]

I know this discussion is re: Location Intelligence, but fyi Raj is open
to the idea of doing some sort of OGC/OSGeo combined mashup for Where
2.0 -- might be some reusable demoware in here?

-mpg

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: viscom-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org 
> [mailto:viscom-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Chris Holmes
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:02 AM
> To: Visibility Committee Discussion List
> Cc: Robert Bray
> Subject: Re: [Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] Where 2.0 
> brainstorming
> 
> Could do something like set up a PostGIS database, configure 
> GeoServer 
> and MapGuide to both use it.  Then make a MapGuide front-end, an 
> openlayers front-end for GeoServer.  Add in MapGuide WMS to 
> openlayers. 
>   Then show off editing through MapGuide and editing on uDig to 
> GeoServer WFS, and how it edits the same backend...  And can 
> also throw 
> in MapBuilder or MapBender WFS-T if there's time...
> 
> Tyler Mitchell wrote:
> > Great - I'd really like to see if between Chris and Bob we 
> could have a 
> > session that shows some interoperability between GeoServer and 
> > MapGuide.  Any great ideas come to mind?  Of course, I'm 
> sure with the 
> > few hours you have each of you could fill it up 
> individually - but I 
> > think showing interoperability will go a long ways.
> > 
> > Tyler
> > 
> > On 26-Jan-07, at 8:53 AM, Nathalie Mainland wrote:
> > 
> >> Bob Bray is willing to do a workshop session on MapGuide 
> and help at the
> >> booth.
> >> Nathalie
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: viscom-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> >> [mailto:viscom-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of 
> Chris Holmes
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 5:00 PM
> >> To: Visibility Committee Discussion List
> >> Subject: Re: [Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] Where 2.0 
> brainstorming
> >>
> >> I think we should definitely use the half day workshop 
> spot.  I can do
> >> GeoServer stuff really easily since we already have that 
> all written
> >> out.  And I'm happy to volunteer at the booth.
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> Tyler Mitchell wrote:
> >>> I've been working on Location Intelligence - need to finalise some
> >> more
> >>> speaker titles, etc. and decide if we want to use the half day
> >> workshop
> >>> spot we have and to hussle people to help at booth.
> >>>
> >>> Autodesk will donate booth space but we need to figure 
> out budgets,
> >> etc.
> >>> so we can get new booth material/posters, etc. through 
> OSGeo funds.
> >>>
> >>> I think we're looking pretty good for this event so far 
> with the work
> >>> I've done, but we need booth stuff and volunteer rallying mainly.
> >>>
> >>> Tyler
> >>>
> >>> On 25-Jan-07, at 2:42 PM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I can spare some ergs in the next few days for event 
> stuff -- but not
> >>
> >>>> sure if I should try and resume our contacts with the 
> Where gang, or
> >>>> should we do anyhting about Location Intelligence instead?
> >>>>
> >>>> -mpg
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >>>>     *From:* viscom-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>     [mailto:viscom-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *Tyler
> >>>>     Mitchell
> >>>>     *Sent:* Thursday, January 25, 2007 8:40 AM
> >>>>     *To:* Visibility Committee Discussion List
> >>>>     *Subject:* Re: [Viscom-dev] FW: [Mass-Market-GEO] Where 2.0
> >>>>     brainstorming
> >>>>
> >>>>     I have not been in touch with them lately, but someone really
> >>>>     needs to.  I think having an interoperability 
> demo-fest would be
> >> a
> >>>>     great way for us to engage with each other.  I'm seeing this
> >>>>     opportunity forming more and more and is something I 
> think OSGeo
> >> +
> >>>>     OGC can really take the lead on.
> >>>>
> >>>>     Aside from that I really want to follow up with our 
> opportunities
> >>>>     with Where 2.0 organisers directly, but have been 
> too swamped.
> >>>>     Anyone else out there who would like to coordinate 
> it?  I have
> >>>>     some ideas, but not much time at present to be effective in
> >> making
> >>>>     them happen.
> >>>>
> >>>>     Tyler
> >>>>
> >>>>     On 24-Jan-07, at 4:38 PM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>     Tyler, et al:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     OGC/Raj is wondering what to do at Where 2.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     I know I'm way out of the loop on this, but have we 
> talked with
> >>>>>     the Where folk lately?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Viscom-dev mailing list
> >>>> Viscom-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Viscom-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/viscom-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Viscom-dev mailing list
> >>> Viscom-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/viscom-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> !DSPAM:1003,45b946dc144454750375898!
> >>
> >> --Chris Holmes
> >> The Open Planning Project
> >> http://topp.openplans.org
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Viscom-dev mailing list
> >> Viscom-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/viscom-dev
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Viscom-dev mailing list
> > Viscom-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/viscom-dev
> > 
> > !DSPAM:1003,45ba3ffb286621116498154!
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Chris Holmes
> The Open Planning Project
> http://topp.openplans.org
>