[VisCom] FW: Fact Sheets

[Tyler Mitchell]

Hi Michael,
I like the layout of the 2nd one better, as it highlights the project  
itself first.   On the first one, I find the horizontal bar to feel a  
little heavy and it seems like an unnatural disconnect to have the  
OSGeo header, then the line, then the project name.  I think of  
having a pile of these and having the osgeo logo and header stuff on  
the top of each one will feel pretty redundant and heavy.  Whereas,  
having it on the bottom is still redundant but is a bit more discreet  
about it.

One exception would be when we have a fact sheet about OSGeo  
itself :)  But we can deal with that exception when it comes.  I have  
done up several fact sheet and letter style pages this past week and  
am looking forward to throwing them into a template like this.

Tyler

On 5-Dec-06, at 3:18 PM, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:

> Comments?  (I like the first one better; the second seems to  
> "heavy" on the top.)
>
> -mpg
>
>
>
> From: John Close [mailto:johnc at pushdesign.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:07 AM
> To: Michael P. Gerlek
> Subject: Fact Sheets
>
> Michael
>
> Enclose are two possible fact sheet styles. Choose one and we will  
> create the two remaining fact sheets in a similar style.
>
> J
>
> __________________________
>
> John Close | Creative Director
>
> Push Design
> 111 S. Lander Street #204,
> Seattle, WA 98134
>
> T: 206 749 9995
> F: 206 749 9970
> M:206 390 9328
>
> www.pushdesign.net
>
>
>
> <OSGeo_FactSheets.pdf>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev- 
> help at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/visibilitycommittee_dev/attachments/20061205/184bfc89/attachment.html