[VisCom] Logos, Round II

Jason Birch Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca
Wed Nov 1 21:35:58 EST 2006


I didn't order the clock, was just playing around :)
 
I didn't change any of the elements.  My PDF->PDF translation to get a good high-res raster image of the logo messed up the colours; probably because I was using a free pdf writer to print from Acrobat Reader.  I started with the second image on the alternate backgrounds page, had to do a level balance to get back to pure black in the background, and then I played with the saturation to get it to look less grassy.  I don't have pantone colours, etc (sorry).
 
Jason
 

________________________________

From: Michael P. Gerlek
Sent: Wed 2006-11-01 5:44 PM
To: dev at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [VisCom] Logos, Round II


I don't much like the clock design, but the other one is great.
 
You appear to be using a different green than the one in John's latest revisions, I think?  I do like yours better -- do you know what colors are you using?  Did you change the shading/reflections or anything at all, or just the colors themselves?
 
-mpg
 

 

________________________________

	From: Jason Birch [mailto:Jason.Birch at nanaimo.ca] 
	Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 12:57 AM
	To: dev at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
	Subject: RE: [VisCom] Logos, Round II
	
	
	OK,
	 
	I've done up some pins for myself at AU at CafePress, and uploaded the image I used along with an image I was playing around with for the clock here:
	 
	https://visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=102
	 
	Jason

	 
________________________________

	From: Tyler Mitchell [mailto:tylermitchell at shaw.ca]
	Sent: Tue 2006-10-31 9:59 AM
	To: dev at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
	Subject: Re: [VisCom] Logos, Round II
	
	

	Sorry guys, I'm under water for the next day or so.  I took a quick peek at this but won't be able to follow the whole thread at the moment.  Apologies if this has already been discussed...
	
	1- I really like the "reversed" example, last page, best.  With a few minor tweaks.
	
	2- The 'limier' green sure makes the previous one look blue.  My first reaction to the new green was not good.  Having them side by side probably isn't helping my opinion, perhaps this will work though.  Takes some time to grow on me I think.
	
	3- I see some talk about the tagline.  I agree that we have a version available with it, but in many cases won't use it.  Obviously the ".. Geo Network" won't work :)
	
	4- Sans font for tagline is much improved.
	
	5- I am less and less liking the color on black and hope we can move to a white on green, or just green on white.
	
	My two bits worth, hope it's helpful.
	
	+1 on doing up some pins, Jason.
	
	Tyler
	
	
	----- Original Message -----
	From: "Michael P. Gerlek" <mpg at lizardtech.com>
	Date: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:15 pm
	Subject: [VisCom] Logos, Round II
	
	> See attached from John Close.
	>
	> He reminds me that "Remember, we will not be able to please
	> everyone..."and that at this point we need to give him final
	> instructions.  I'm
	> personally happy with the "revised proposal" (although not the tag
	> line;I don't like his suggestion or our current one).
	>
	> Do people like the New Green?  (Being a bit colorblind, I will abstain
	> from any color votes...)
	>
	> I *really* like the "full color" and "reversed" logos on the last
	> page.
	>
	> Please send all comments to the list ASAP, so we can harmonize and
	> continue our push on this.
	>
	> -mpg
	>
	
	---------------------------------------------------------------------
	To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
	For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at visibilitycommittee.osgeo.org
	
	

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 8229 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/visibilitycommittee_dev/attachments/20061101/b2e348ad/attachment.bin


More information about the Visibilitycommittee_dev mailing list