[Web Comm] Logo Contest revisited

[Frank Warmerdam]

Fred Warnock wrote:
> <thinking out loud>All this being said, I doubt armatures with a spark 
> of an idea would be able to finish a logo like this.  I wonder if we 
> would also accept "partial" submissions, which are simply logo 
> concepts.  This could perhaps be another category?  Just an idea to get 
> more participation. I'm a "designer" myself, but I find logo's to be 
> extremely time consuming and challenging, and I probably won't 
> contribute, but If I do get an idea I might want to submit 
> that....</thinking out loud>

Guys,

I agree with Fred that a promising design that might not meet all
requirements, but could be completed after the fact should still be
considered.  If a design is good, it isn't that hard to complete the
various versions after the fact.

BTW, I had high hopes for what Fred might have submitted.  In fact I
think it may be challenging to get a significant number of high quality
submissions.  I guess widely advertising the contest, and giving some time
for people to work on it are key.

Best regards,
-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGF, http://osgeo.org