[Wps-discuss] shootout 2013

[Jachym Cepicky]

Good question,

I just got promised from LOC, there is time slot reserved for the
shootout, I'll ask them for more specific details

Jachym

Dne 28.8.2013 01:51, Jody Garnett napsal(a):
> Quick logistics question, where is the presentation in the program?   
> 
> While I have managed to attend the conference, it is dependent on running the recording sessions :D As such I would really like to know what room it is so I have a chance to take part.  
> 
> --  
> Jody Garnett
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, 28 August 2013 at 8:15 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>  
>> I hope, there is already person in your WPS community, which will take
>> responsibility for the WPS Shootout/roundup presentation for FOSS4G,
>> which starts in few weeks. So far, there is only few lines from 52North
>> project.
>>  
>> The presentation is divided into 4 sections, every project has reserved
>> slide in each section, so it would be nice, if you could write something
>> into four slides:
>>  
>> 1 - General project description
>> 2 - What you consider special about your project
>> 3 - What you consider problematic about your project
>> 4 - People behind each project
>>  
>> I would also like Benjamin Proß or anybody else from the wps 2.0.0 team,
>> to add some infos about their work (will contact them separately).
>>  
>> Anybody has different opinion about the shootout, or different proposal
>> how we should do it? If not, please go ahead (or I'll shoot you)!
>>  
>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MJMLthdLjKwyyA3Tf2b6VmyKJdcj8SULi-HoRpKTZRA/edit#slide=id.p
>>  
>> Jachym - deputy sheriff
>>  
>> Dne 25.7.2013 06:11, Jody Garnett napsal(a):
>>> On Wednesday, 24 July 2013 at 9:43 PM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>  
>>>> sorry for delay, back at work (mostly, still),
>>>>  
>>>> so, what will we do? Shell we start with the wiki, where everybody
>>>> will add some features of particular project, so at the end, we
>>>> will have table of project (columns) and their features (rows), so
>>>> we can see, what's interesting where?
>>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> You may want to make a shared google presentation, so people can fill
>>> in project details & information (and collaborate on what will be
>>> shown?)
>>>> We could also do client-server crosscheck, each client would draw  
>>>> (randomly pick) some server, and then both (server and client)
>>>> could demonstrate their compatibility (of course, hard work on both
>>>> sides is assumed).
>>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> I think if teams could provide a download (or service) link it would
>>> be great. Teams that provide a download earlier will get the most
>>> testing in. That said last time we were really light on clients :(
>>>  
>>> I have gotten a few questions off-list asking what is going on as
>>> they could not see WPS on the FOSS4G program.
>>>  
>>> Aside: You could also go for "WPS Roundup" which may be taken as let
>>> adversarial than "shootout"
>>>  
>>  
>>  
>> --  
>> Jachym Cepicky
>> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com (http://gmail.com)
>> http://les-ejk.cz
>> PGP: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Jachym Cepicky
jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
http://les-ejk.cz
PGP: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/wps-discuss/attachments/20130828/d44ec732/attachment.pgp>