[ZOO-Discuss] ZOO Project WPS Validity report

[René-Luc D'Hont]

  Hi ZOOers,

I've published the Gérald text on my blog :
http://3liz.org/blog/rldhont/index.php/2010/09/20/344-zoo-project-wps-validity-report
And translated it in french :
http://3liz.org/blog/rldhont/index.php/2010/09/20/345-rapport-de-validite-du-zoo-project-vis-a-vis-de-la-norme-wps-de-l-ogc

René-Luc D'Hont
3Liz

Le 20/09/2010 10:22, Gérald Fenoy a écrit :
> Hi ZOOers,
>
> Several WPS related presentation at FOSS4G2010 including the 
> one entitled "Compliance testing of Open Source Software for 
> Web Processing Services" took place this year [1].
>
> The presentation above reported about some incorrect results about the 
> ZOO-WPS implementation. So the ZOO-Tribe decided to provide a report 
> based on the same techniques than the one used in above presentation 
> and clarify of the ZOO Kernel valid XML responses using only Open 
> Source software to run the tests.
>
> The results of our tests are available on wiki page on the official 
> ZOO Project Trac system [2] where you can read the results we got when 
> running the validity tests for each requests discussed during the 
> conference. As we are in an Open Source community we also provided a 
> tool [3] to run the tests on your own using a simple bash script 
> (working also on GNU/Linux and MacOS X). This way you can ensure that 
> tests made were appropriate. Based on this tool we created another 
> script which provides periodically a web report available on the 
> ZOO-Project web site [4].
>
> Contrary to what was said during in [1], all the tests made was 
> successfully validated. Nevertheless, on the OGC external wiki [5], we 
> noticed that the URLs used to run tests on the ZOO Kernel response 
> validity was wrong so we have corrected it on this wiki page also.
>
> Finally the conclusion to this test are the following :
>
> a) ZOO Kernel provide XML document in responses to WPS request which 
> are all valid,
> b) ZOO Kernel support all the Execute request type
>
> I hope you can take few minutes of your busy time to read the report 
> and check by yourself that everything is working fine with the ZOO 
> Kernel and maybe even more in the form of a a generic way to test our 
> WPS implementation responses validity which will be useful for future 
> testing.
>
> Best regards,
>
> [1] http://2010.foss4g.org/presentations_show.php?id=3604
> [2] http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/wiki/ZOOWPSImplementationReport
> [3] 
> http://www.zoo-project.org/trac/attachment/wiki/ZOOWPSImplementationReport/testXmlValidation.sh
> [4] http://zoo-project.org/ZOODEMOREP/demoReport1.html
> [5] 
> http://external.opengeospatial.org/twiki_public/bin/view/WPS/ComplianceTestingResults2010
>
> Gérald Fenoy
> ZOO PSC Chair
> gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr <mailto:gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zoo-discuss mailing list
> Zoo-discuss at gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
> http://gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp/mailman/listinfo/zoo-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/zoo-discuss/attachments/20100920/5616bf72/attachment.html>