[ZOO-Discuss] ZOO Debian Package

[Daniel Kastl]

Hi Gerald,

Is ZOO-Project going to be more than WPS? Alessandro's proposal idea to call
it "zoo-wps" isn't bad IMO.
Another idea would be - in case ZOO Services and API could be
installed extra - to split them in packages like "zoo-kernel",
"zoo-services", "zoo-api" with being "zoo-kernel" required for others.

Well, shouldn't become to complicated on the other hand.

Daniel



2010/9/20 Gérald Fenoy <gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr>

> Hi Alessandro,
> nice to hear  from you.
>
> I think it can be better to use ZOO-Project, if this is acceptable in
> Debian packaging name. If not then maybe you can use zoo-project.
>
> We will create a branch and tag officially in some days, we need to
> finalize the Perl support integration first. It was currently tested by
> David Saggiorato on his own (some part was already integrated in the SVN
> source tree). We also need to add a ZOO Service Provider which will access
> some shared memory to get information on the current status of a process. I
> think that those two enhancement can be finalized really soon and then
> we can tag as 1.0.1 version. Other plan for the 2.0 version will start next
> week, it will include the modification of service functions signature, the
> main reason for creating a new version.
>
> Please use the SVN source tree and not the archive 1.0 you talked about,
> indeed we have to provide the new version of the archive soon for the new
> version present in SVN.
>
> If you need the branch quickly please let me know, we will create it faster
> than we planned to do.
>
> Hope to hear from you,
> best regards,
>
>
> Le 20 sept. 2010 à 13:22, Alessandro Frigeri a écrit :
>
> Hei Nick, Venka + zooers,
>
> thanks for the details.  Sorry, I've missed the 1.0 was there already
> there, http://www.zoo-project.org/dl/ZOO-Kernel-1.0.tar.bz2, i'll
> submit un update to our request to debian.
>
> Also, I've found there is already a package named "zoo", to manipulate
> zoo archives.  So we can go with with "zoowps"  "zoo-wps" or whatever
> is good to differentiate from the other package.  Suggestions are
> welcome so we can start up in good shape with debian and the ubuntu
> packages.
>
> For the version scheme, it seems ok to me.  Nick, let's experiment an
> svn copy trunk to some 1.0.x tag.
>
> Alessandro
>
>
> 2010/9/20 Venkatesh Raghavan <raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp>:
>
> Hi Alessandro,
>
>
> Thanks for the follow-up at debian/ubuntu miniconf
>
> regarding ZOO
>
>
> I think ZOO could follow the similar
>
> scheme as GRASS GIS as below;
>
>
> Version number scheme:
>
>
> * first number: major release number
>
> * secondary number: minor release number (stable/development indicator)
>
> * third number: revision
>
>
> Scheme for ZOO-Kernel 1.0.1 which is presently available
>
> would be as follows
>
>
> a) 1 being the major release number
>
> b) 0 being the minor release number
>
> c) 1 being the revision
>
>
> Any suggestions from others?
>
>
> Best
>
>
> Venka
>
>
> On 2010/09/20 6:00, nicolas bozon wrote:
>
> Hi Alessandro,
>
>
> Thanks for the request to Debian !
>
> ZOO Kernel was released on April 2010 under 1.0 version.
>
> We are now under the 1.0.1 since last week, as the svn was updated with new
>
> version by gerald
>
> I think we still have to improve the branching, you're right.
>
> Best,
>
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> 2010/9/19 Alessandro Frigeri<afrigeri at unipg.it>
>
>
> Hi zooers,
>
>
> The debian/ubuntu mini conf was very fruitful - nice ideas and nice
>
> people.  For zoo, I've placed a request on debian:
>
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597445
>
>
> Are you guys going to tag a release (e.g. 1.0 or whatever call a
>
> major/minor version)?  It will be a lot easier to refer the package to
>
> a tagged version (and produce package files accordingly).
>
>
> Ciao!
>
>
> Alessandro
>
>
>
> 2010/9/17 Venkatesh Raghavan<raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp>:
>
> Hi Alessandro,
>
>
> Was great meeting you in Barcelona.
>
> Gerald, David and Yoshida have
>
> trying to make the Debian package
>
> from ZOO-Kernel.
>
>
> Maybe you can help us. Also, please
>
> consider joining the ZOO-Discuss ML.
>
>
> Best
>
>
> Venka
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Alessandro Frigeri, PhD
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Zoo-discuss mailing list
>
> Zoo-discuss at gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
>
> http://gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp/mailman/listinfo/zoo-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Zoo-discuss mailing list
>
> Zoo-discuss at gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
>
> http://gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp/mailman/listinfo/zoo-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Zoo-discuss mailing list
>
> Zoo-discuss at gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
>
> http://gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp/mailman/listinfo/zoo-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alessandro Frigeri, PhD
> _______________________________________________
> Zoo-discuss mailing list
> Zoo-discuss at gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
> http://gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp/mailman/listinfo/zoo-discuss
>
>
>  Gérald Fenoy
> ZOO PSC Chair
> gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zoo-discuss mailing list
> Zoo-discuss at gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
> http://gisws.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp/mailman/listinfo/zoo-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/zoo-discuss/attachments/20100920/cdc07f7d/attachment.html>