[ZOO-PSC] Review of release procedure

Venkatesh Raghavan raghavan at media.osaka-cu.ac.jp
Wed Sep 24 07:36:33 PDT 2014


On 2014/09/24 22:16, nicolas bozon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As this step is needed for Incubation process, and because the document is
> good enough for now IMO (it can be improved in future of course), may i
> suggest a motion for voting ?
>
> "Accepting the ZOO-Project Release Procedure available at [1]"
>
> +1 Nick
+1 Venka

>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Best,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> [1] http://zoo-project.org/trac/wiki/ReleaseProcedure
> .
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-09-18 17:02 GMT+02:00 Angelos Tzotsos <tzotsos at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would also like to add that the incubation process also needs the source
>> code review step.
>> For pycsw, we asked Jody for advice and he pointed us to the GeoServer
>> wiki, where there are examples of the code review process.
>>
>> Also have a look here about release documentation:
>> https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/Release-Packaging
>>
>> Best,
>> Angelos
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Kastl <daniel at georepublic.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gerald,
>>>
>>> Is this release "checklist" based on how other projects do?
>>>
>>> I thought it might be worth to think about following the crowds and also
>>> move to Github for example. It may also simplify contributions by people,
>>> that may maintain there own copy and changes without being able to
>>> contribute in an easy way.
>>>
>>> On Github then I would create an issue for each release and assign it to
>>> the release manager. Issues on Github in the meanwhile support also
>>> checklists, which are very convenient for a release. See the example
>>> checklist of the latest pgRouting release:
>>> https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/issues/120
>>>
>>> Also release notes and release downloads can be managed automatically
>>> with Github. So I feel this is more convenient. And no need to run an SVN
>>> server.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Fenoy Gerald <gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear PSC,
>>>> I would like to ask you to review the following document [1].
>>>>
>>>> I would appreciate any kind of comment about it. This document represent
>>>> the last thing which we consider missing for incubating at OSGeo.
>>>>
>>>> Waiting for comments or direct editing of the wiki page.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://zoo-project.org/trac/wiki/ReleaseProcedure
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gérald Fenoy
>>>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Zoo-psc mailing list
>>>> Zoo-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zoo-psc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
>>> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
>>> Web: http://georepublic.info
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Zoo-psc mailing list
>>> Zoo-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zoo-psc
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Angelos Tzotsos
>> Remote Sensing Laboratory
>> National Technical University of Athens
>> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Zoo-psc mailing list
>> Zoo-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zoo-psc
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zoo-psc mailing list
> Zoo-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/zoo-psc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/zoo-psc/attachments/20140924/b0f87478/attachment.html>


More information about the Zoo-psc mailing list