[ZOO-PSC] Fwd: Re: [mapserver-users] Tinyows as a WFS-T server - error commiting write

[Jeff McKenna]

In that earlier message, the link I provided to the GeoMOOSE discussion 
was wrong, here is the correct one: 
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geomoose-users-Vector-editing-with-WFS-T-td5255918.html

-jeff



On 2016-03-29 9:42 AM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Hello fellow ZOO-keepers! :)
>
> Note the message below, where I am again strongly nudging the MapServer
> PSC to include the ZOO-Project.
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Tinyows as a WFS-T server - error
> commiting write
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:33:32 -0300
> From: Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>
> To: mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org
>
> Hi Andrea,
>
> MS4W includes TinyOWS and demo data, and you can follow along how to
> configure it at http://www.ms4w.com/README_INSTALL.html#h-tinyows An
> OpenLayers client is also included that is pre-configured for MS4W.
>
> Recently the GeoMOOSE developers (http://www.geomoose.org/) were adding
> this to their own demo as well (WFS-T using GeoMOOSE, TinyOWS and MS4W)
> and they were successfull. You can follow along that discussion here:
> http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Geomoose-users-using-WFS-T-td5256500.html
>
>
> Also, for your research be sure to examine the ZOO-Project
> (http://www.zoo-project.org/), as it is a very powerful WPS instance, as
> well as WFS-T (through either MapServer or GeoServer).  I also plan on
> adding it into the base of MS4W soon.  ZOO-Project has so many
> highlights, including the ability to have your data in any GDAL/OGR
> format.  I honestly hope, as a MapServer PSC member, we can again
> discuss the ZOO-Project coming inside the MapServer umbrella, as we had
> discussed this earlier, but since then I've noticed several other
> MapServer PSC members using ZOO - so maybe we/ZOO were ahead of our
> time, and the time is better now.  Note that I am on both the
> ZOO-Project and MapServer steering committees.
>
> Thanks for bringing up WFS-T for discussion.
>
> -jeff
>
>