[Benchmarking] (no subject)

Dane Springmeyer dane at dbsgeo.com
Thu Aug 12 14:40:17 EDT 2010


On Aug 12, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Luc Donea wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> As already discussed in yesterday's irc meeting, I would like to propose that we trim the tests down to "best effort" vector and raster only.
> 
> It seems rather silly doing a baseline test when everyone still has different shape indexes, different styling, different overview pyramids.
> We already have a lot of tests to do and not that much time, so this would allow us to concentrate on best effort.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
I understand and respect where you are coming from, but my feeling is that if anything I would trim to *just* baseline, as time is short, styling should be able to be nearly identical, and pyramids as well. Shape indexes can/should be documented as per:

http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Benchmarking_2010#Documenting_Server_Details_and_Differences
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Luc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Benchmarking mailing list
> Benchmarking at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/benchmarking

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/benchmarking/attachments/20100812/6d5ce691/attachment.html


More information about the Benchmarking mailing list