[OSGeo-Conf] 2012 Next Step: Question period

[Dave McIlhagga]

My sense on this is much like Jeff's.

I would just add a caveat that I think we would want to feel reasonable confidence in the event being successful in whichever location is selected - so the assessment of bids from outside NA or Europe should meet some minimal criteria in that regard if they were to be selected.

Dave


On 2011-08-22, at 4:45 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:

> Mike,
> 
> I did address this in an email response on 07-18:
> 
> ****
> What happened is that we did not receive any submissions before the initial deadline, and then we opened the bidding to all areas, and then we received 1 submission from the desired region and 2 from Europe, and then a late submission from the desired region.
> 
> My opinion is that the stated desired region is in fact still the desired region, and that all OSGeo conference committee members should keep this information in their head as they vote. (meaning: all 4 letters are an option for this voting stage, but the preferred region is 'anywhere other than NA or Europe')
> ****
> 
> I feel the same applies to this final stage.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> On 11-08-22 5:17 PM, Smith, Michael ERDC-CRREL-NH wrote:
>> Jeff,
>> 
>> One question I never saw answered was if the Non-North America, Non-Europe
>> preference was in effect for 2012 given that all submissions were late?
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev