[OSGeo-Discuss] Degree vs GeoTools API

Stefan Steiniger sstein at geo.uzh.ch
Thu Feb 11 18:49:10 EST 2010


Hei Frans,

could you outline in more detail what you are aiming to do?
I.e. what the students (after training) and the software (to be 
programmed) should be able to do?
If it is about web mapping then you may consider a whole different range 
of FOSS4GIS.

stefan

Frans Thamura wrote:
> thx for the nice reply .
> 
> 
> i have work with our goverment spatial division, teaching java, and
> they are 100% blank in development, this is a transformation program
> from a division to create map become a services entity ->
> www.bakosutranal.go.id
> 
> i am also teaching highschool develop apps on Java, and we success
> create web java programmer in architectural mode, and they will get
> schoolarship to university, mostly they are poor and smart, and
> several dont have computer, and several never visit Jakarta (they
> families never visit Jakarta)..
> 
> my idea to help them to the level that they can provide solution.
> 
> Landon, ur reply sound that using Geotools API will harder for them?
> is that right?
> 
> i am still working for both to find the best one
> 
> 
> hope my reply can link our problem. we have human resource and bad
> education program in this country, so may be our student different
> with people outside this country
> 
> F
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Landon Blake <lblake at ksninc.com> wrote:
>> Frans,
>>
>> I will try to provide an intelligent answer to your question based on my
>> own experience.
>>
>> Here is my observation of the main difference between Deegree and
>> Geotools:
>>
>> Degree seems to be a more closely knit group of developers, coming from
>> just a couple of organizations, while Geotools draws developers from all
>> over the place.
>>
>> This has some different implications for users of the libraries and for
>> developers.
>>
>> I find the Deegree API is often easier to use but not as well
>> documented. The Geotools API is better documented but much more
>> complicated. I think this extra complication in Geotools stems from its
>> efforts to please such a diverse group.
>>
>> I have contributed a single "unsupported" module to Geotools. This
>> process wasn't too burdensome, and I found a couple of the programmers
>> in Geotools were a delight to work with. I also learned a lot from my
>> very limited work on Geotools. I typically work on code that plugs into
>> a single program, and participation in Geotools requires you to write
>> code that can be used in all sorts of programs. You need a different
>> type of thinking to do that.
>>
>> The programmers from Deegree were also very responsive on their mailing
>> list.
>>
>> Deegree uses a feature model somewhat similar to JUMP's. I find the
>> Geotools feature model is very hard to learn and work with.
>>
>> I hope that helps.
>>
>> Landon
>> Office Phone Number: (209) 946-0268
>> Cell Phone Number: (209) 992-0658
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>> [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frans Thamura
>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 1:30 AM
>> To: OSGeo Discussions
>> Subject: [OSGeo-Discuss] Degree vs GeoTools API
>>
>> hi all
>>
>> anyone can share the difference between Deegree vs GeoTools API
>>
>> thx
>>
>>
>> --
>> Frans Thamura
>> Meruvian.
>> Experiential Tempation of Java and Enterprise OpenSource
>>
>> Meruvian jTechnopreneur Program (S1) telah hadir, Dapatkan benefit
>> bagi SMK yang melakukan mapping SKKD, dg program beasiswa dari
>> Gunadarma
>>
>> Mobile: +6287885901958
>> Blog & Profile: http://frans.thamura.info
>>
>> We provide services to migrate your apps to Java (web), in amazing
>> fast and reliable.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>> Warning:
>> Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 


More information about the Discuss mailing list