[Foss4g2010] Presentations and posters

[Lorenzo Becchi]

Paul, others,
does it make sense to have three session per hour for both academic and not?

The program is still flexible and this is the time to decide about it.

we will decide inside the LOC about the 15+5 for academic, I don't see any
major problem for the moment to approve it.
It would be easier, IMO, if the program can be synchronized between academic
and not to let people easily choose their own scheduling of presentations.

lorenzo



On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>wrote:

> Warning: Don't balkanize the academic track by choosing a different
> presentation format from the other content. If everything is
> consistent, the talks can be mixed and matched into rooms depending on
> expected *demand and interest* rather than artificial categories
> ("it's academic").
>
> Best,
>
> P.
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Venka <venka.osgeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Helena Mitasova wrote:
> >>
> >> others may have different suggestion but how about making the
> >> presentations 20min + 5 min for discussion which would allow for more
> >> presentations?
> >>
> >
> > +1 for academic track. I would even suggest 15min+5 as in most academic
> > conferences where
> > full paper proceedings are published.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Foss4g2010 mailing list
> > Foss4g2010 at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/foss4g2010
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/foss4g2010/attachments/20100129/e432b803/attachment-0001.html