[Gdal-dev] gdal1.4.0beta2.tar.gz contains gdal1.4.0beta1 code???

[Dori]

Frank,

do you know if fix for bug 1384 was included in the newest FWTools release?
I tested gdal 1.4.0beta2 included in FWTools latest package, and I still get
same black output.

Tx again

On 12/29/06, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Dori wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I have already tried to use gdal by downloading FWTools updated with
> > beta2 and a problem I experienced with previous gdal version is still
> > there(pls. see below description of original problem).  So, I decided to
> > try on a different computer with gdal package.
> > I downloaded gdal1.4.0beta2.tar.gz package from gdal.org
> > <http://gdal.org> yesterday.  I compile the source code and install gdal
> > on a Ubuntu Linux PC.  All seemed to be OK.  However, when I tried to
> > find out if the proper version was installed by running: "gdalinfo
> > --version" , I got version 1.4.0beta1 version installed.
> > I didn't install beta1 before in this PC.  Does anyone have an idea if
> > this is just a bug and the version is beta2 although the --version says
> > is beta1?
>
> Dori,
>
> I accidentally neglected to update the internal version info in Beta2, so
> it still reports beta1.
>
> Best regards,
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
> warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20061229/6c3558fc/attachment.html