[gdal-dev] Question about gdal2wktraster
mateusz at loskot.net
Mon Jul 13 18:14:00 EDT 2009
Pierre Racine wrote:
> 4267 should be the right CS (http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4267/).
Actually, it isn't.
What gdalinfo reports for the file cea.tif is a projected CS,
this one to be precise:
"There does not seem to be an EPSG equivelent."
Check this too:
I'd suggest to test datasets based on EPSG 4326 first.
After these work for you, then switch to projected ones.
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
More information about the gdal-dev