Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 2.0 Notes
ivan.lucena at pmldnet.com
Thu Sep 23 13:48:43 EDT 2010
> -------Original Message-------
> From: Ari Jolma <ari.jolma at gmail.com>
> To: gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL/OGR 2.0 Notes
> Sent: Sep 23 '10 09:04
> On 09/22/2010 09:52 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> > Folks,
> > In IRC I was just mentioning to Howard that we might want to drop use of
> > CPL_STDCALL in the GDAL API if a 2.0 release ever occurs. It seemed
> > to me
> > that such ideas ought to be kept track of so off the "Developer"
> > section of
> > the Trac wiki I have created a page for this and pre-populated it with
> > a few
> > items. Please feel free to add other cleanup suitable to do at such an
> > ABI breaking version.
> > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GDAL20Changes
> > As we are running out of 1.x numbers (1.8.0 hopfully coming out soon)
> We can always have 1.10 and 1.11 etc. That would not be uncommon (there
> is for example Perl 5.10 as we're waiting for Perl 6). However, I'm for
I like that.
> having 2.0, not just because numbers ran out but because that would be a
> chance to do something a bit more major. One idea would be to make a
> general call for new ideas and wish lists.
But maybe the support for UNICODE could be considered a major change. No?
> Best regards,
> > , I'm
> > thinking about a 2.0 release for something like the fall of 2012 -
> > just in
> > time for the world to end.
> > Best regards,
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the gdal-dev