[gdal-dev] Raster Attribute Table RFC

Frank Warmerdam warmerdam at pobox.com
Tue May 14 13:54:25 PDT 2013


Sam,

It looks good to me, though I'm dubious about the value of treating
booleans as Byte instead of integer.

Best regards,
Frank



On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Sam Gillingham <gillingham.sam at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I propose a motion to get RFC 40 - "Improving performance of Raster
> Attribute Table implementation for large tables" adopted. This adds some
> new functionality for GDAL 2.0. Even and others have made suggestions and
> these have been incorporated into the RFC:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
>
> Thanks,
> Sam.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>



-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20130514/f251589b/attachment.html>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list