[gdal-dev] Raster Attribute Table RFC

[Etienne Tourigny]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>wrote:

> Sam,
>
> It looks good to me, though I'm dubious about the value of treating
> booleans as Byte instead of integer.
>

everywhere else booleans are defined as integers like this

int bSomeVar;


>
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Sam Gillingham <gillingham.sam at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I propose a motion to get RFC 40 - "Improving performance of Raster
>> Attribute Table implementation for large tables" adopted. This adds some
>> new functionality for GDAL 2.0. Even and others have made suggestions and
>> these have been incorporated into the RFC:
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sam.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
> warmerdam at pobox.com
> light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20130514/0e17850f/attachment-0001.html>