[geomoose-psc] RFC-7

James Klassen klassen.js at gmail.com
Wed Jul 19 18:48:26 PDT 2017


Supporting Windows for the toolchain is important (I bet people never
thought I'd write that) because many organizations are effectively stuck on
Windows. Forcing them to build in an unfamiliar Linux VM effectively means
they wouldn't be able to build and would be unnecessarily limited in their
ability to participate in the GeoMoose community.

We want to encourage people to contribute fixes, enhancements, tests,
documentation, and build a shared knowledge through experimentation with
GeoMoose.  We want to make it easy to transition from just downloading and
configuring it to making a few simple code changes and fixes to working
fully in git.

This is now feasible given the work the nodejs people and git people have
done to port the tools to Windows.  This includes a more or less usable
bash shell and common commands. So there is no longer a technical necessity
not support building on Windows.

On Jul 19, 2017 7:04 PM, "Eli Adam" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:

> I've been offline and will vote +0 for now in the absence of catching
> up and testing.
>
> Is the release in accordance with
> https://www.geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-3.html and
> https://www.geomoose.org/developer/release.html#how-to-release (does
> this need updating and/or a new 3.# version)?
>
> Supporting Windows in the development tool chain is very admirable but
> I'm not entirely sure needed.  Supporting Windows fully for deployment
> is really important.  Many things, arguably not part of the
> development tool chain, (nightly builds, post commit hooks, release
> preparation, etc) are done in bash and other things.
>
> Oh, I see that I'm confused.  This isn't for a release, this is to
> undertake the 3.0 direction.  Yeah, +1.
>
> Eli
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Bump! Eli, TC, can we get a vote?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 10, 2017 4:10 PM, "Dan Little" <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey Folks!
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the official authorization for GM3.0... please comment and
> vote!
> >>>>
> >>>> - https://geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-7.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> -Duck
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
> >>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> geomoose-psc mailing list
> >> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > geomoose-psc mailing list
> > geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20170719/c904b631/attachment.html>


More information about the geomoose-psc mailing list