[geomoose-psc] RFC-7

[Dan Little]

So sayeth we all, so it shall be.

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:48 PM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> wrote:

> Supporting Windows for the toolchain is important (I bet people never
> thought I'd write that) because many organizations are effectively stuck on
> Windows. Forcing them to build in an unfamiliar Linux VM effectively means
> they wouldn't be able to build and would be unnecessarily limited in their
> ability to participate in the GeoMoose community.
>
> We want to encourage people to contribute fixes, enhancements, tests,
> documentation, and build a shared knowledge through experimentation with
> GeoMoose.  We want to make it easy to transition from just downloading and
> configuring it to making a few simple code changes and fixes to working
> fully in git.
>
> This is now feasible given the work the nodejs people and git people have
> done to port the tools to Windows.  This includes a more or less usable
> bash shell and common commands. So there is no longer a technical necessity
> not support building on Windows.
>
> On Jul 19, 2017 7:04 PM, "Eli Adam" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>
>> I've been offline and will vote +0 for now in the absence of catching
>> up and testing.
>>
>> Is the release in accordance with
>> https://www.geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-3.html and
>> https://www.geomoose.org/developer/release.html#how-to-release (does
>> this need updating and/or a new 3.# version)?
>>
>> Supporting Windows in the development tool chain is very admirable but
>> I'm not entirely sure needed.  Supporting Windows fully for deployment
>> is really important.  Many things, arguably not part of the
>> development tool chain, (nightly builds, post commit hooks, release
>> preparation, etc) are done in bash and other things.
>>
>> Oh, I see that I'm confused.  This isn't for a release, this is to
>> undertake the 3.0 direction.  Yeah, +1.
>>
>> Eli
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Bump! Eli, TC, can we get a vote?
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jul 10, 2017 4:10 PM, "Dan Little" <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hey Folks!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is the official authorization for GM3.0... please comment and
>> vote!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> - https://geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-7.html
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Duck
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> >>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> >>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> >> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > geomoose-psc mailing list
>> > geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20170720/4e015f01/attachment.html>