[Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the Live DVD, which is more stable?

Bob Basques Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
Wed Jun 15 14:05:40 EDT 2011


Dan, 

Well, the examples I was referring to, were those on the GeoMoose site.  Which I've had get fouled up with the navigation tools.  Sometimes the interface gets lost if you jump back and forth from the on map controls to the top tool bar controls in the mercator demo for example. 

The parcel ID function in the county demo is outputting some MapServer errors. 

I was planning on just copying these into the Live DVD originally, but they look like they need fixing, at least in the case of the Parcel ID stuff.   

So, should I copy them and configure for 2.4 or fix the 2.2 version? 

bobb 






>>> Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:


There is absolutely nothing in 2.2 that should work that doesn't in 2.4.  The code is not that different.  Fix your configuration. 





From: Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
To: "geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net" <geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the Live DVD, which is more stable?


Dan, 



That's the problem.  I had to build a case to include some local demos in the LIVE DVD installer ,but not everything seems to work in the 2.2 stuff, so to fix, it seems better to address the same capabilities in the 2.4 version instead of repairing the 2.2 demos. 



bobb 





>>> Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com> wrote:


Ugh... Yeah, GM2.4 has a ton of fixes that are reasonably important.  Especially when you take it away from the demo configuration. 






From: Bob Basques <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>
To: geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:24 AM
Subject: [Geomoose-users] POLL: Geomoose 2.2 or 2.4 on the Live DVD, which is more stable?



All, 



in your estimation (of those that have used GM2.4, would you think that 2.4 is more or as stable as GM2.2? 



It has been suggested that using GM2.2 for the LiveDVD may be better than going with a newer version. 



Any thoughts? 



bobb 






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geomoose-users mailing list
Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users


 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geomoose-users mailing list
Geomoose-users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geomoose-users


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20110615/74f0c435/attachment.html


More information about the Geomoose-users mailing list