[Geomoose-users] Culling Trac

[Dan Little]

Now that main.js isn't that long, I doubt there was too much to be edited this time.  The Toolbar issue is slightly concerning but I'll investigate when I actually start testing in IE.

Which will be a bit later.



>________________________________
>From: Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>
>To: Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com>
>Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List <geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 3:20 PM
>Subject: RE: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac
>
>
> 
>Ok, the first bug I see in trunk is the toolbar doesn’t not show up in IE9.  Works fine in FF6.  I’m using the geomoose_dev.html file.
> 
>I see Brent previously emailed these two things as well.
>     - I had to remove the trailing comma on line 579 of main.js to get Geomoose_dev to load (deja-vu).
>     - IE (8 or 9) doesn't display the toolbar, but both Chrome and Firefox do.
> 
> 
>Brian Fischer, CFM
>GIS Manager 
>Houston Engineering, Inc.
>O763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734
> 
>From:Dan Little [mailto:danlittle at yahoo.com] 
>Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 1:53 PM
>To: Brian Fischer; Brent Fraser
>Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List
>Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac
> 
>Trunk should probably be a discussion on the list, however, generally, bugs in trunk are not really considered bugs until an RC1 or DR1 has been stamped.
> 
>>
>>________________________________
>> 
>>From:Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>
>>To: Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com>; Brent Fraser <bfraser at geoanalytic.com>; Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com>
>>Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List <geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 1:25 PM
>>Subject: RE: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac
>>Since we are in between migrating Trac.  Where should we report bugs for the current code that is in trunk?  Or should I just hold them until OSGeo get’s trac setup for us?  I’m beginning to test things.
>> 
>>Brian Fischer, CFM
>>GIS Manager 
>>Houston Engineering, Inc.
>>O763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734
>> 
>>From:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brian Fischer
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:50 PM
>>To: Brent Fraser; Dan Little
>>Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List
>>Subject: RE: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac
>> 
>>Once we have a 2.6 up and running I would be willing to go through them and see if they are still valid or if they can be closed.
>> 
>>Brian Fischer, CFM
>>GIS Manager 
>>Houston Engineering, Inc.
>>O763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734
>> 
>>From:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:geomoose-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brent Fraser
>>Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 2:11 PM
>>To: Dan Little
>>Cc: GeoMOOSE Users List
>>Subject: Re: [Geomoose-users] Culling Trac
>> 
>>Duck,
>>
>>  Six of the tickets I've submitted are still open, but I don't know if they will be fixed as a side-effect of the re-work for 2.6.  If most (all?) of the code for 2.6 is now in trunk, I could try to reproduce them....
>> 
>>Ticket Summary 
>>#97 Identify Attributes on a WMS not finding the feature 
>>#119 Printing WMS layer does not work if requested projection different from view 
>>#121 Feature Editor - Missing Required Field 
>>#39 popups fail if layer coordinate system different from map coordinate system 
>>#98 Identify Attributes on a WMS requires a return type of application/vnd.ogc.gml 
>> 
>>Ticket Summary 
>>#5 Editing complex polygons and lines in Internet Explorer 
>> 
>>Best Regards,
>>Brent Fraser
>>
>>On 9/19/2011 12:28 PM, Dan Little wrote: 
>>PSC,
>> 
>>Can we get some lists built for what Trac tickets are important and/or still apply?
>> 
>>I think that we should probably have two categories:
>> 
>>A) 2.4 bug(s) that should be fixed. This implies that a 2.4.1 release is important and should be done.
>>B) Bugs/Enhancements that are important for 2.6.
>> 
>>It may be worthwhile to categorize the other tickets or justify why they are being dropped.  I believe many will simply be subsumed by 2.6 functionality but that is not going to be universally true.
>> 
>>Users,
>> 
>>Input is also worthwhile here.
>> 
>>-Duck
>> 
>>_______________________________________________
>>Geomoose-users mailing list
>>Geomoose-users at lists.osgeo.org
>>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-users
>> 
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-users/attachments/20110921/03f94bf1/attachment-0001.html