[GeoNode-devel] About suggestion to switch between Coveralls or Codecov

[Alessio Fabiani]

+1

I like very much codecov and I would prefer that one on GeoNode 2.7+ at
least.

Regards,

Alessio Fabiani

==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V
for more information.
==

Ing. Alessio Fabiani

@alfa7691
Founder/Technical Lead


GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax:     +39 0584 1660272
mob:   +39 331 6233686

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o
nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il
loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio,
per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo
messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di
darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio
stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso,
divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od
utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai
principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.

The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for
the attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act
(Legislative Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection
Code).Any use not in accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction,
copying, distribution, or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is
strictly forbidden except previous formal approval of the named
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail and delete the
information in this message that has been received in error. The sender
does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy or
completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of
e-mail transmission, viruses, etc.

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Rizky Maulana Nugraha <rizky at kartoza.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Following our discussion here: https://github.com/
> GeoNode/geonode/pull/3378 about Codecov, I would like to explain a little
> bit more about Codecov.
>
> Codecov.io is a coverage reporting tools, similar with coveralls.io.
> The reason why I propose to switch to codecov is the ability to report on
> aggregate coverage.
> This ability and reason is further described here: https://github.com/
> GeoNode/geonode/issues/3362
>
> In summary:
> Kartoza is trying to push QGIS Server backend functionality upstream. This
> allows GeoNode to communicate with QGIS Server Backend (as its OGC Backend).
> We are just trying to provide an alternative backend and not replacing
> GeoServer, so when you use GeoServer, you can’t use QGIS Server backend,
> and the other way around.
> GeoServer backend is also a lot more mature and deeply integrated with
> GeoNode, so there are many functionalities in GeoServer that QGIS Server
> doesn’t have yet.
> With this in mind, we propose that we configure a paralellized CI job to
> run unittests on Travis, each for GeoServer and QGIS Server.
> These configuration will run GeoNode unittests with GeoServer as a
> backend, and also run GeoNode unittests with QGIS Server as a backend.
> When each job is completed, the coverage on each job will obviously report
> code coverage related with each backend only.
> In other words, job for GeoServer will not cover codes for QGIS Server and
> the other way around.
> This makes coveralls report a significantly lower coverage for both, and
> the one that will be shown on the badge is coming from the last job.
> Coveralls also doesn’t support aggregate coverage (AFAIK at the time we
> wrote codes for QGIS Server backend), more details can be seen on this old
> issue:
> https://github.com/lemurheavy/coveralls-public/issues/613
> This is the main reason why we propose to switch to codecov. Codecov are
> able to aggregate the coverage report from each build job, so we get the
> total coverage.
>
> However, today after a little bit of research, I found out that now
> coveralls also support parallel build. We can see it here:
> http://docs.coveralls.io/parallel-build-webhook
> But I haven’t tried this one because I’m not aware of it exists previously
> before switching to codecov. We can also try this one but I didn’t have
> access to REPO_TOKEN.
>
> So, in this email I just want to let other developer know of the
> situations and options. We can discuss what the dev community prefers.
> For myself, I’m fine with either way, as long as it can support aggregate
> coverage.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Rizky Maulana Nugraha
> Software Developer
> rizky at kartoza.com
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geonode-devel mailing list
> geonode-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geonode-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geonode-devel/attachments/20171031/9400eb46/attachment-0001.html>