[geos-devel] Benchmark between various geometry libraries

[Martin Davis]

Yeah, that'd be interesting.  I thought about trying to run the test 
cases, but it's not really relevant unles they are run in the same 
environment.

Paul Ramsey wrote:
> I wonder if we could somehow prevail upon Maxime to add JTS to the
> benchmark set, to disentangle algorithm from implementation.
>
> P.
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca> wrote:
>   
>> Probably something as simple as running Maxime's test polygons and
>> watching the profile in Shark would give the answer, since the
>> difference is so huge.
>>
>> P.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Martin Davis <mbdavis at refractions.net> wrote:
>>     
>>> Maxime van Noppen wrote:
>>>       
>>>> It's quite interesting to have some numbers though, as sometimes they
>>>> can lead to significant performance boost (CascadedPolygonUnion is a
>>>> good example). It might be interesting to analyze why geos is 23x slower
>>>> than other geometry libraries in some cases whereas it competes with
>>>> them elsewhere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Yes, definitely it's nice to have examples of how things can be improved.
>>>
>>> Personally I intend to stay well away from any C++ template hacking, though!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Martin Davis
>>> Senior Technical Architect
>>> Refractions Research, Inc.
>>> (250) 383-3022
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geos-devel mailing list
>>> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>>>
>>>       
> _______________________________________________
> geos-devel mailing list
> geos-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geos-devel
>
>   

-- 
Martin Davis
Senior Technical Architect
Refractions Research, Inc.
(250) 383-3022