[GRASS-dev] proper v.parallel behavior on strange input

[Росен Матев]

Actually, when dist <= 1.61, v.buffer works fine.

Waiting for suggestions,
Rosen

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Росен Матев <r.matev at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Note that this particular input produces wrong buffers when using the
> old v.buffer and vlib/buffer.c (no matter what the specified distance
> is: dist < 5,  5 < dist < 10, dist > 10, it outputs wrong things).
> Similar issues will arise when using the new buffer.c. As I was
> thinking how to resolve them, I've come to the conclusion that it
> might not be possible to use the parallel line generation to make
> buffers. I'll think over it a little more and then I'll decide
> (hopefully with your help) whether it is inevitable to separate
> v.buffer from parallel line generation.
>