[GRASS-dev] Some wxGUI tests on Windows

[Helena Mitasova]

On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:25 PM, Michael Barton wrote:

> I've been working with some students using the latest stand alone  
> binary from Colin. I've had no trouble with r.shaded.relief at least  
> on XP. I have not tested the other issues but can if you'd like.

I can confirm that shaded relief works in winGRASS from wxGUI - we use  
it in almost every assignment - maybe something with your data? wrong  
region?

Helena
>
>
> Also, I've learned that the georectifier is broken in 6.4 at least  
> on the Mac. It may work on Linux, but I'm not sure about the lastest  
> version. Haven't yet tested on Windows, but probably will soon.
>
> Michael
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:05 AM, grass-dev-request at lists.osgeo.org wrote:
>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:55:15 +0200
>> From: Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org>
>> Subject: [GRASS-dev] Some wxGUI tests on Windows
>> To: GRASS developers list <grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Message-ID:
>>       <86782b610910011055u7c85c80bgff93082d2f49c3da at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> today I had occasion to test on a colleague's computer the
>> latest binary package.
>> Here a list of some issues I came across (tell me which should
>> become a ticket):
>>
>> - Map canvas: zoom to RGB layer finishes in the 0..1 space
>> (solution might be to zoom to one channel of the RGB set?)
>>
>> - closing the message window which tells that the digitizer is
>> unavailable kills the entire GUI
>>
>> - r.shaded.relief doesn't show any error but the result is  
>> completely NULL.
>> Perhaps due to the fact that it is a shell script? If so, I would  
>> suggest
>> to add a Windows test and to bail out rather than continue unless it
>>  is substituted with the Python version (6.4.1?).
>>
>> - i.group does not permit to select a subgroup (apparently the list  
>> isn't
>>  fetched from the group file). Adding it manually works.
>>
>> - i.maxlik seems to be unable to read the signature file: ill- 
>> conditioned
>> signatures for all classes. It *seems* to be an issue to read the  
>> encoding
>> of the ASCII signature file. Any G_getl() which should be G_getl2()?
>> If so, what's the purpose of still keeping G_getl()?
>>
>> Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev