AW: AW: AW: [Mapserver-inspire] MapServer and INSPIRE

[Stephan Meißl]

Hi Martin,

great, thanks for your feedback.

Would be nice if the answer would be added to the discussion page you
posted on the INSPIRE forum.

Thanks,
Stephan


On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 11:03 +0100, Martin Kofahl wrote: 
> Hi Stephan,
> 
> I did update the test service from svn this week. Looks ok to me. Regarding the rootlayer - the requirement of named layers generally - I got an answer from gdi-de.org saying that an inspire view service can also include non-inspire layers, both above and beneath an inspire layer. Thus, the rootlayer may have a name or not and I will probably restore the group layers for the test service.
> 
> On the downside, I see no chance to completely pass current validators.
> 
> Best regards,
> Martin
> 
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:40:01 +0100
> > Von: "Stephan Meißl" <stephan at meissl.name>
> > An: Martin Kofahl <M.Kofahl at gmx.net>
> > CC: mapserver-inspire at lists.osgeo.org
> > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Mapserver-inspire] MapServer and INSPIRE
> 
> > Hi Martin
> > 
> > thanks a lot for all the tickets and patches you provided over the last
> > weeks!
> > 
> > I applied the patches (sometimes slightly adjusted) from the following
> > tickets to the INSPIRE sandbox: #4144, #4129, #4149, #4148, and #4151.
> > In addition I renamed wms_metadataurl_href to
> > wms_inspire_metadataurl_href as suggested and made "wms_style_title" and
> > "wms_style_<name>_title" multilingual.
> > 
> > Did you receive any feedback on your question in the inspire forum?
> > 
> > Do you see any further open points?
> > 
> > Thanks again,
> > Stephan
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 10:20 +0100, Martin Kofahl wrote: 
> > > Hi Stephan,
> > > this is my last item from the todo list below. Please take a look at the
> > patch attached to #4151 regarding the keyword vocabulary attribute.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Martin
> > > 
> > > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > > Datum: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:34:33 +0100
> > > > Von: "Stephan Meißl" <stephan at meissl.name>
> > > > An: Martin Kofahl <M.Kofahl at gmx.net>
> > > > CC: E.Nash at dvz-mv.de, mapserver-inspire at lists.osgeo.org
> > > > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Mapserver-inspire] MapServer and INSPIRE
> > > 
> > > > Hi Martin,
> > > > 
> > > > see comments below.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 14:49 +0100, Martin Kofahl wrote: 
> > > > > Hi Stephan,
> > > > > 
> > > > > handling of wms_layer_group looks ok. I did test GetMap and
> > > > GetFeatureInfo. Now it's much easier to configure full featured
> > groups. However, I did
> > > > not alter the inspirevs_test service, because it looks as inspire view
> > > > service may not have named groups. I did post a question on the
> > inspire forum.
> > > > See
> > > >
> > http://inspire-forum.jrc.ec.europa.eu/mod/groups/topicposts.php?topic=79913&group_guid=5205#34121. 
> > > > > 
> > > > great, it will be good to now the official answer for your post.
> > > > 
> > > > > One thing I miss regarding wms_layer_group is the possibility to
> > > > configures an unnamed group, thus for structuring the capabilities
> > only.
> > > > > 
> > > > All names that appear in wms_layer_group but don't have a layer with
> > the
> > > > same name are treated as unnamed groups. 
> > > > 
> > > > > Regarding open ToDos, here are my favorites:
> > > > > 
> > > > > - I see GetLegendGraphic requests still not working:
> > > >
> > http://www.geodaten-mv.de/dienste/inspirevs_test?language=ger&version=1.3.0&service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&sld_version=1.1.0&layer=TN.RailTransportNetwork.RailwayArea&format=image/png&STYLE=inspire_common:DEFAULT
> > > > > 
> > > > Strange, GetLegendGraphic requests are working nicely in the test
> > > > mapfile I generated from your one. 
> > > > 
> > > > > - The testsuite I use expects Content-Type application/vnd.ogc.gml
> > > > instead of text/xml for GML-GetFeatureInfo responses. This has to be
> > verified.
> > > > > 
> > > > I agree.
> > > > 
> > > > > - AuthorityURL and Identifier may be quired at rootlayer, too
> > > > > 
> > > > You mean at service level and root layer?
> > > > 
> > > > > - Map -> Web -> wms_metadataurl should be renamed to
> > > > wms_inspiremetadaurl and Map -> Web -> wms_metadataurl should be
> > available for the root layer.
> > > > > 
> > > > Do you need the metadataurl only for the root layer?
> > > > 
> > > > > - Handling of keywords should be revised. Instead of
> > wms_inspire_keyword
> > > > we should talk about wms_keywordvocabulary "ISO" and so parse
> > > > wms_keywordlist and wms_keywordlist_ISO.
> > > > > 
> > > > I agree, keywork handling needs some attention. If you have a good
> > > > proposal I'd be happy to integrate it :)
> > > > 
> > > > > - Style Title should be multilingual, too.
> > > > > 
> > > > OK, that shouldn't be too difficult. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I can start with the AuthorityURL and MetadataUrl topics. Someone
> > who
> > > > can investigate into the GetLegendGraphic problem?
> > > > 
> > > > Great, many thanks! As said GetLegendGraphic requests are working for
> > > > me, so need to reproduce your problem first. Any ideas?
> > > > 
> > > > cu
> > > > Stephan
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Martin
> > > > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mapserver-inspire mailing list
> > Mapserver-inspire at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-inspire