FW: [Mapserver-users] RE: Topozone in the news ..

[Lowther, David W]

Hey Bob,

While we are still new to the partnership, it seems as though the
relationship between a partner and USGS provides a nice way to convey ideas
/ suggestions / etc... In fact, that's one of the goals of the partnership.
In theory, there would be a heirarchy of partnerships through which
appropriate comments could flow. But, considering how many useful tips and
answers I pick up from the Mapserver Users Group it sure does seem like a
National Map Users Group (or another for whatever implementation is
happening) would be in order.

Dave


> -----Original Message-----
> From: bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us 
> [mailto:bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:02 PM
> To: mapserver-users at lists.gis.umn.edu
> Subject: Re: FW: [Mapserver-users] RE: Topozone in the news ..
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> This topic has been interesting to follow.  I have a couple 
> of comments on it.
> 
> I'm wondering about alternative forms of service, still web 
> based though.  Certain aspects of mapping data distribution 
> can be improved with a variety of caching techniques for 
> example, to name one, among
> many.   what would be the best way to demonstrate/relate 
> these types of
> ideas to this partnership.  I would assume that one or both 
> would be interested in hearing from the general user base.
> 
> What would a partnership such as this be interested in as far as
> feedback from the user communities if at all.   Should these idea
> related specifically to Mapserver (for this list) or is there 
> another forum for such conversations in place somewhere?  I 
> didn't find anything specifically related.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> bobb
> 
>  >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mapserver-users mailing list
> Mapserver-users at lists.gis.umn.edu 
> http://lists.gis.umn.edu/mailman/listinfo/maps> erver-users
>