[mapserver-users] Question on rfc 86

[Jana Golinowski]

> Good point. I've just been waiting for someone more proficient than me, 
> who confirms that this approach makes sense ;-)
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Tamas
> 
> 
> 2011/5/16 Daniel Morissette <dmorissette at mapgears.com 
> <mailto:dmorissette at mapgears.com>>
> 
>     On 11-05-14 03:21 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
> 
>         However the desired scale range (MINSCALEDENOM, MAXSCALEDENOM) could
>         indeed be taken into account when accessing the source layers,
>         by using
>         a minor change.
> 
> 
>     If that's not the case already then I think MINSCALEDENOM,
>     MAXSCALEDENOM from the source layer should be taken into account by
>     default with UNION layers. i.e. when one sets up a layer with
>     min/max scale, it is normally because the data is not appropriate
>     for use at other scales, so I see no reason to expose via in the
>     union layer outside of those scales either.

I agree with this. Additionally SYMBOLSCALEDENOM, LABELMINSCALEDENOM and 
LABELMAXSCALEDENOM could also be taken into account for similar reasons.

Greetings, Jana.