noreply at geocartic.com
Wed Jun 6 15:33:10 EDT 2007
Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
> Isn't Tim or someone else working on GeoJSON to give an alternative to
> WFS that does not have the XML parsing and overhead? I would think that
> this might be a good alternative. If this is really happening, then we
> might want to ping the mapserver list about support GeoJSON in the 5.0
> -Steve W
I think we're close to an agreed upon specification for GeoJSON.
You can take a look at WKT/GML/GeoJSON side by side (sort of) in this demo
FeatureServer will deal in GeoJSON. I'm guessing GeoServer will as
well. It would be cool to get MapServer in on it.
More information about the Users