[pdal] (no subject)

[Connor Manning]

This choice was made because to access the new static EPT format, you must
use DXYZ keying to read the data files.  Therefore it seemed fitting to
match the hierarchy notation to the data storage notation.  Also, with the
new data keying format being a slippy-map tiling, it seemed sensible to
avoid mixing it with the old octree-node relative addressing.

Comments/criticisms on the format in general are welcome - and feel free to
submit issues on that `ept` repository in that regard.

Cheers,
Connor

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:45 PM Daniel Kastl <daniel at georepublic.de> wrote:

> Hi Connor (or Howard),
>
> We found, that in the EPT format you switched from a list of oct-tree
> numbers to to a depth-x-y-z format:
> https://github.com/connormanning/ept#hierarchy
>
> I would be interested to know about the reason for this change (advantages
> of the new hierarchy/disadvantages of the previous one). I'm not against
> the change, just curious to learn about the reasons.
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
> --
> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
> Web: https://georepublic.info
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pdal mailing list
> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pdal/attachments/20180710/6362ec77/attachment.html>