[postgis-devel] RFC3

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

Paul Ramsey wrote:

> I'd like to bring this to a vote. I have not touched the naming of 
> longxact functions on purpose, because I think that's a separate 
> discussion. I'm willing to have that discussion, but I don't want it to 
> stop doing the RFC3 change.
> 
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/195

The only thing I noticed was the name of the GiST functions, e.g. 
postgis_gist_compress(). Given that we hope to have a geography type at 
some point, perhaps we should consider postgis_gist_geometry_compress() 
etc...

Other than that, +1 from me as it makes things seem a lot tidier.


ATB,

Mark.

-- 
Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
PostgreSQL - PostGIS
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
t: +44 870 608 0063