[postgis-devel] Raster Regressing

dustymugs dustymugs at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 13:52:36 PDT 2011


Paul,

I've managed to set myself up with a freshly installed OSX machine with 
the following software and have no raster regression failures.

OSX 10.6.8
Xcode 3.2.6
Fink 0.31.0
PostgreSQL 9.0.4
GEOS 3.3.0
PROJ 4.7.1
GDAL trunk r22922
PostGIS trunk r7730

I don't know what to say except wonder if there is some linking issue 
taking place.

-bborie

On 08/10/2011 04:51 PM, dustymugs wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Can you add a ticket for this? I think you're the first mentioning that
> there are problems with OSX. I know we had issues with Windows and GDAL
> but I think we've resolved those (Regina or Pierre may know more).
>
> As I don't have access to an OSX machine, I hope you don't mind if I ask
> you later for a valgrind output.
>
> As for the offline raster tests, I think there is a ticket for
> converting those tests to cunit but the work hasn't been done yet.
>
> -bborie
>
> On 08/10/2011 04:00 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> Gdal 1.9-dev,
>> OS/X 10.6.8
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:56 PM, dustymugs<dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/10/2011 03:52 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've got 6 failures in the raster online regressions (jeepers, is a
>>>> backend crash), which I guess is what things were like before... and
>>>> last time my response was just to stop testing raster for six months,
>>>> which is probably not what you want people to do. Can we either get
>>>> the tests to pass on all platforms or replace them with tests that do?
>>>> Because faced with "should be right but are failing" tests, people
>>>> just stop trusting the tests at all, or stop running them.
>>>>
>>>> I'm also quite non-fond of the offline raster tests, which are noisy
>>>> and not at all clear on what's good and what's not. Is cunit not
>>>> appropriate for them?
>>>>
>>>> P.
>>>>
>>>> rt_asgdalraster. failed (diff expected obtained:
>>>> /var/folders/vQ/vQpcmrOZEXuINbyg+7Jj4k+++TI/-Tmp-//test_10_diff)
>>>> rt_astiff. failed (diff expected obtained:
>>>> /var/folders/vQ/vQpcmrOZEXuINbyg+7Jj4k+++TI/-Tmp-//test_11_diff)
>>>> rt_asjpeg. failed (diff expected obtained:
>>>> /var/folders/vQ/vQpcmrOZEXuINbyg+7Jj4k+++TI/-Tmp-//test_12_diff)
>>>> rt_aspng. failed (diff expected obtained:
>>>> /var/folders/vQ/vQpcmrOZEXuINbyg+7Jj4k+++TI/-Tmp-//test_13_diff)
>>>> ...
>>>> rt_resample. failed (diff expected obtained:
>>>> /var/folders/vQ/vQpcmrOZEXuINbyg+7Jj4k+++TI/-Tmp-//test_41_diff)
>>>> rt_asraster. failed (diff expected obtained:
>>>> /var/folders/vQ/vQpcmrOZEXuINbyg+7Jj4k+++TI/-Tmp-//test_42_diff)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tadpole:postgis-svn pramsey$ cat
>>>> /var/folders/vQ/vQpcmrOZEXuINbyg+7Jj4k+++TI/-Tmp-//test_10_diff
>>>> --- rt_asgdalraster_expected 2011-05-25 11:27:53.000000000 -0700
>>>> +++ /var/folders/vQ/vQpcmrOZEXuINbyg+7Jj4k+++TI/-Tmp-//test_10_out
>>>> 2011-08-10
>>>> 15:47:31.000000000 -0700
>>>> @@ -5,11 +5,7 @@
>>>> 1
>>>> 1
>>>> 1
>>>> -1
>>>> -1
>>>> -1
>>>> -1
>>>> -1
>>>> -1
>>>> -1
>>>> -1
>>>> +server closed the connection unexpectedly
>>>> + This probably means the server terminated abnormally
>>>> + before or while processing the request.
>>>> +connection to server was lost
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> What version of GDAL are you running? All the functions that are
>>> regressing
>>> hook directly into the GDAL library. Also, what OS are you running?
>>>
>>> -bborie
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>



More information about the postgis-devel mailing list