[postgis-devel] SFCGAL version requirements?

[Paul Ramsey]

Hah, only one function has a version dependency,

Datum sfcgal_approximate_medial_axis(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)

probably it's new so the packager got bitten this time out.

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:55 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>
wrote:

> Right, it will build OK, but you'll be missing some functions. I see tests
> for
>
> POSTGIS_SFCGAL_VERSION
>
> in the code. So if I build against 1.3 and then deploy against 1.2 I'll
> have symbols missing, as in the question. I guess this is a packager
> problem really, someone built against 1.3 but didn't declare a tight
> version dependency.
>
> P.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl>
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/2016 03:19 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> > Regarding this stackexchange question:
>> >
>> >
>> https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/204575/libsfcgal-so-1-undefined-symbol-upgrading-to-postgis-2-2-2
>> >
>> > Is it possible that PostGIS 2.2 requires SFCGAL 1.3? If so, our
>> configure
>> > script should be doing a version test, but I don't see that happening in
>> > the configure.ac.
>>
>> I don't think so, OSGeo-Live built PostGIS 2.2.2 with SFCGAL 1.2.2
>> without issue.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Bas
>>
>> --
>>  GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
>> Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20160803/03d2265b/attachment.html>