[Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation (fwd)

[Jachym Cepicky]

I've started this

https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki/OSGeo_Incubation_checklist

how will we approach? who will mark the items as "checked" after which
procedure?

J

čt 23. 4. 2015 v 19:09 odesílatel Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
napsal:

> I just say: thank you for keeping this warm.
>
> I'm all for your proposals. Will start the wiki a bit.
>
> J
>
> P.S. Sorry for long response times from myself - this spring is somehow
> fast
>
> čt 23. 4. 2015 v 15:39 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> napsal:
>
>
>> Thanks Jachym.  I've updated InCom and passed the motion for Board
>> approval.
>> I've also filed a ticket to add PyWPS to the Incubating Projects list [1].
>>
>> I think the next logical step here is to start tackling the project
>> graduation
>> checklist [2], and suggest we use the PyWPS GitHub Wiki as the area to
>> manage
>> the chceklist [3].
>>
>> Using pycsw as a recent example, [4] provides a proposal on how we
>> tracked and
>> managed the entire incubation process.  What do folks think?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> ..Tom
>>
>> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/1488
>> [2]
>> http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/project_graduation_checklist.html
>> [3] https://github.com/geopython/PyWPS/wiki
>> [4] https://github.com/geopython/pycsw/wiki/OSGeo-Incubation
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>>
>> > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:47:30 +0000
>> > From: Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
>> > To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>,
>> >     Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>> > Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> > Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
>> (fwd)
>> >
>> > As Luis is writing and Tom concluding: PyWPS currently  == PyWPS 3
>> >
>> > The repositories are keeped seperated, to point out, "this is something
>> > completely new, new philosophy, code base, license". Once is baked (at
>> > least support for WPS 1:0.0), I would like to move it to geopython
>> project
>> >
>> > J
>> >
>> > pá 17. 4. 2015 v 14:16 odesílatel Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>> > napsal:
>> >
>> >> Sounds like PyWPS = PyWPS 3, then.
>> >>
>> >> I think Jachym as the main contact can update incom.
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>
>> >> On Apr 16, 2015, at 09:26, Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Tom,
>> >>
>> >> The goal is for PyWPS 4 to support WPS 2.0, support for 1.0 is nearly
>> >> covered, appart from assynchronous execution.
>> >>
>> >> As PyWPS 4 is still in development and not user ready, I would prefer
>> to
>> >> keep it in its own repo for now. Once we deem it ready for public
>> release
>> >> then we can think of merging the repos.
>> >>
>> >> How can the InCom be contacted? Or is it something Jachym can do?
>> >>
>> >> Luis
>> >> On 16 Apr 2015 15:13, "Tom Kralidis" <tomkralidis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks Luis.  Can someone clarify this to InCom, then?
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm wondering whether PyWPS 3 / 4 should be in the same repository,
>> with
>> >>> 3 being master and 4 being a branch? This way the project is logically
>> >>> consistent ('PyWPS').
>> >>>
>> >>> Will PyWPS 4 support WPS 1.0.0?
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, 9 Apr 2015, Luís de Sousa wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>  Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 22:02:33 +0200
>> >>>> From: Luís de Sousa <luis.a.de.sousa at gmail.com>
>> >>>> To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>> >>>> Cc: "pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> >>>> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter
>> incubation
>> >>>> (fwd)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hi Tom,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> These two versions are part of a same project.  Version 4 is a major
>> >>>> step forward from version 3, but the underlying concept is the same.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> More than a re-write, PyWPS-4 is intended to deliver WPS 2.0
>> compliance.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Luís
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 9 April 2015 at 13:54, Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi all: FYI per below for clarification as we move forward with
>> OSGeo
>> >>>>> incubation.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Can someone response to Dimitris' question?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ..Tom
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 03:58:09 +0200 (CEST)
>> >>>>> From: Dimitris Kotzinos <kotzino at gmail.com>
>> >>>>> To: incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Incubator] [motion] PyWPS to enter incubation
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hi all,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> no objection in general and the project is within OSGEO scope and
>> has
>> >>>>> been
>> >>>>> around for quite a long time. But I would like to ask for a
>> >>>>> clarification
>> >>>>> before voting: what is the relation between PyWPS-3 and PyWPS-4 and
>> >>>>> since
>> >>>>> the second is written from scratch do we accept both for incubation?
>> >>>>> And if
>> >>>>> so as one project?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks in advance for clarifying this,
>> >>>>> Best regards,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Dimitris
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> Incubator mailing list
>> >>>>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> >>>>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>  _______________________________________________
>> >> pywps-dev mailing list
>> >> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>> >
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20150423/25294d60/attachment-0001.html>