[Pywps-dev] [REST] Multiple running server

[Jachym Cepicky]

>From my perspective - one port for all

J

ne 9. 8. 2015 v 16:39 odesílatel Calin Ciociu <calin.ciociu at gmail.com>
napsal:

> I can look into changing so all the PyWPS instances run only on 1 flask
> instance with 1 port only.
> Then use like Jonas said .../wps1 and .../wps2 in combination with that
> port.
>
> Is this desired?
> Otherwise I will leave it as it is for the moment.
>
> I changed the default REST url to .../wpsadmin which can be configured in
> the PyWPS configuration file under the section [server].
> Just modify the RESTPath attribute value. (has to start with a leading
> slash).
>
> Best regards,
> Calin
>
>
> On 23.07.15 09:19, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>
> Jonas: I believe, this is just flask issue, on apache this should work as
> expected (flask can handle only singe request per time)
>
> flask should not be used in production environment [1] -> Do not use the
> builtin development server in production.
>
> [1] http://flask.pocoo.org/docs/0.10/deploying/
>
> st 22. 7. 2015 v 14:24 odesílatel Jonas Eberle <jonas.eberle at gmx.de>
> napsal:
>
>> Hi Calin,
>>
>> do you also have in mind to publish several PyWPS instances on a single
>> port? For operational use I am not keen on opening a new port for any PyWPS
>> instance in the future. I would like to use WSGI with Apache Webserver to
>> make my instances available. Will this still be available with these
>> developments?
>>
>> I would like to organize my services as follows (path to configured in
>> the settings or in the Apache configuration):
>> http://localhost/wps1
>> http://localhost/wps2
>>
>> For the REST administration interface I would then like to use, e.g.
>> http://localhost/wpsadmin (path to be configured in settings or Apache
>> configuration).
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jonas
>>
>> ----- Am 21. Jul 2015 um 17:23 schrieb Calin Ciociu <
>> calin.ciociu at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I wanted to know people's opinion on the way I am currently implementing
>> the REST interface.
>> Multiple server can be run and managed through the REST interface
>> although every server runs with a different port.
>> So in the end there will be multiple servers running like for example:
>>
>> http://localhost:5001/wps...
>> http://localhost:5002/wps...
>> http://localhost:5003/wps...
>>
>> On top of these a "sever" is already running which is handling REST.
>> It is currently running on port 5000 (which can be also changed).
>>
>> To me this makes sense and seems straightforward.
>> Is there a better approach?
>> Should I continue like this?
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Calin
>> _______________________________________________
>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pywps-dev mailing listpywps-dev at lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pywps-dev mailing list
> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20150811/7bb0a405/attachment.html>