[Pywps-dev] [SoC] [SOC] Week report - Web-based administration and process control for PyWPS

[Jan Rudolf]

Yes, I didn't mean not using Flask as a production a webserver, I count
on Apache/Nginx, but a Flask app for URL handling and web related stuff.

On 2016-06-07 09:21, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
> Just noting: AFAIK we had already problem with Calin some time back,
> flask server was not able to handle more requests at once, Calin tried
> to run the administrative interface on different port, but I
> personally dislike such solution. 
> 
> IMHO the production environment is Apache2/Nginx - we shall focus on
> that
> 
> J 
> 
> po 6. 6. 2016 v 23:06 odesílatel Jan Rudolf <rudolja1 at fit.cvut.cz>
> napsal:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> Settings: yes, I plan to do it.
>>
>> I have been reading a source code of PyWPS and demo applications in
>> order to get a clear picture. I have a meeting with Jachym about
>> REST
>> API on Wednesday, so I would like to implement now an integration of
>> Flask app into PyWPS with URL handling. I understand that Service.py
>> acts as a WSGI application, it's the core thing. I have it as an
>> entry
>> point here
>> https://github.com/jan-rudolf/gsoc-pywps-app/blob/master/wsgi.py.
>> Because we want the web-based administration with own URLs,  so I
>> would
>> like to make as the entry point Flask's WSGI connection with defined
>> URL's based on your wishes and one of the URL for Service.py purpose
>> -
>> similarly as in one of the demo application. So this functionality,
>> I
>> would like to integrate for example into /pywps/webserver/, where
>> would
>> be class Server/Webserver with this features and all the related web
>> (Flask) files. So user would, instead of pointing to
>> Service.py/Service
>> (https://github.com/jan-rudolf/gsoc-pywps-app/blob/master/wsgi.py),
>> assign Server(config=config_file).run() (or similar) and it will run
>> classic PyWPS with our extended URLs. Make it copy-paste-run for the
>> user. What do you think? OR I will just implement it with my forked
>> version and we can discuss it better.
>>
>> After this, process control will come in.
>>
>> Jan Rudolf
>>
>> On 2016-06-06 20:46, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> nice work
>>>
>>> would it be possible to document your settings and so on in PyWPS
>>> documentation? Take is as part of your work ;-)
>>>
>>> J
>>>
>>> ne 5. 6. 2016 v 21:18 odesílatel Jan Rudolf
>> <rudolja1 at fit.cvut.cz>
>>> napsal:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> here is my week report
>>>> http://gsoc-2016.jan-rudolf.cz/article/second-week-report.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, Jan Rudolf
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SoC mailing list
>>>> SoC at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/soc
>> _______________________________________________
>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev