[Pywps-dev] GeoPython conference

[Jachym Cepicky]

Ok, I'll add PyWPS-4 explicitly to the workshop submission

ne 20. 3. 2016 v 17:16 odesílatel Luí­s de Sousa <
luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch> napsal:

> Dear all,
>
> The talk for the GeoPython conference was accepted. I will wait for May to
> start a presentation.
>
> I agree with Jonas, to be relevant the FOSS4G workshop should be on
> PyWPS-4. I still do not have much time to contribute, but I will be surely
> present at the conference.
>
> I also agree on submitting a talk to FOSS4G. We could simply do the same
> talk as for GeoPython. I will send the abstract right away.
>
> Regards,
>
> Luís
>
> *Sent from ProtonMail <https://protonmail.ch>, encrypted email based in
> Switzerland.*
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] GeoPython conference
>
> Local Time: March 20, 2016 2:50 PM
> UTC Time: March 20, 2016 1:50 PM
> From: jonas.eberle at gmx.de
> To: jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
> CC: pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>
> Extending is not possible, but if it's only one or two sentences we
> probably can remove some other. I think we should submit just one general
> abstract for PyWPS including project news (incubation, PSC, ...) and the
> new PyWPS-4. I would not make so much a difference between the versions.
>
> Also for the workshop, my opinion is to use the new PyWPS-4. Are there
> reasons why to focus on the "older" PyWPS-3 anymore? For new projects I
> would start with PyWPS-4.
>
> Cheers,
> Jonas
>
> ----- Am 19. Mrz 2016 um 23:12 schrieb Jachym Cepicky <
> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>:
>
> Ha, .. I probably should not extend the abstract.
> Shall we submit 2 talks? PyWPS-4 and PyWPS status report?
>
> J
>
> pá 18. 3. 2016 v 11:13 odesílatel Jonas Eberle <jonas.eberle at gmx.de>
> napsal:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> as I just submitted another abstract to FOSS4G, I realised that only a
>> maximum of 250 words are allowed for the abstracts. So I shortened and
>> modified the version from Luís for the Geopython conference. You'll find it
>> in the wiki:
>> https://github.com/geopython/pywps/wiki/FOSS4G-2016-conference-talk
>>
>> Please modify it if necessary. But keep in mind that abstract deadline is
>> next Monday (21st of March). So we need to submit the abstract on Monday at
>> the latest.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jonas
>>
>>
>> ----- Am 15. Mrz 2016 um 14:11 schrieb jonas eberle <jonas.eberle at gmx.de
>> >:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> thank you for your work, Luís. Should we submit the same abstract for the
>> FOSS4G talk? I guess this would be suitable.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jonas
>>
>> ----- Am 10. Mrz 2016 um 13:24 schrieb Luí­s de Sousa <
>> luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch>:
>>
>> Dear all, a few updates on the GeoPython conference:
>>
>> 1. The talk proposal is now submitted with the abstract found in the
>> Wiki: https://github.com/geopython/pywps/wiki/GeoPython-conference-2016
>>
>> 2. A code spring proposal is also submitted, including the day before the
>> conference (24th). I booked it for 4 participants: me, Jonas, Jachym and
>> someone else that may attend. Please inform me if you intend to be there.
>>
>> 3. All participants must register, even those furnishing an address or a
>> workshop. The early bird rate is open until the end of this month.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Luís
>>
>> P.S.: I will likely miss the meeting today.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pywps-dev mailing list
>> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20160320/b7a3e71a/attachment-0001.html>