[Pywps-dev] GeoPython conference

Sun Mar 20 09:16:23 PDT 2016

Dear all,

The talk for the GeoPython conference was accepted. I will wait for May to start a presentation.

I agree with Jonas, to be relevant the FOSS4G workshop should be on PyWPS-4. I still do not have much time to contribute, but I will be surely present at the conference.

I also agree on submitting a talk to FOSS4G. We could simply do the same talk as for GeoPython. I will send the abstract right away.

Regards,

Luís

Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in Switzerland.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] GeoPython conference
Local Time: March 20, 2016 2:50 PM
UTC Time: March 20, 2016 1:50 PM
From: jonas.eberle at gmx.de
To: jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
CC: pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org

Extending is not possible, but if it's only one or two sentences we probably can remove some other. I think we should submit just one general abstract for PyWPS including project news (incubation, PSC, ...) and the new PyWPS-4. I would not make so much a difference between the versions.

Also for the workshop, my opinion is to use the new PyWPS-4. Are there reasons why to focus on the "older" PyWPS-3 anymore? For new projects I would start with PyWPS-4.

Cheers,
Jonas

----- Am 19. Mrz 2016 um 23:12 schrieb Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>:

Ha, .. I probably should not extend the abstract.
Shall we submit 2 talks? PyWPS-4 and PyWPS status report?

J

pá 18. 3. 2016 v 11:13 odesílatel Jonas Eberle <jonas.eberle at gmx.de> napsal:

Hi all,

as I just submitted another abstract to FOSS4G, I realised that only a maximum of 250 words are allowed for the abstracts. So I shortened and modified the version from Luís for the Geopython conference. You'll find it in the wiki:
https://github.com/geopython/pywps/wiki/FOSS4G-2016-conference-talk

Please modify it if necessary. But keep in mind that abstract deadline is next Monday (21st of March). So we need to submit the abstract on Monday at the latest.

Cheers,
Jonas

----- Am 15. Mrz 2016 um 14:11 schrieb jonas eberle <jonas.eberle at gmx.de>:

Hi all,

thank you for your work, Luís. Should we submit the same abstract for the FOSS4G talk? I guess this would be suitable.

Cheers,
Jonas

----- Am 10. Mrz 2016 um 13:24 schrieb Luís de Sousa <luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch>:

Dear all, a few updates on the GeoPython conference:

1. The talk proposal is now submitted with the abstract found in the Wiki: https://github.com/geopython/pywps/wiki/GeoPython-conference-2016

2. A code spring proposal is also submitted, including the day before the conference (24th). I booked it for 4 participants: me, Jonas, Jachym and someone else that may attend. Please inform me if you intend to be there.

3. All participants must register, even those furnishing an address or a workshop. The early bird rate is open until the end of this month.

Cheers,

Luís

P.S.: I will likely miss the meeting today.

_______________________________________________
pywps-dev mailing list
pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
_______________________________________________
pywps-dev mailing list
pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20160320/c12a2902/attachment.html>