[Pywps-dev] flake8 setup

[Luí­s de Sousa]

Hi everyone,

I never used flake8 before. I will just trust your judgement on it.

Luís


Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in Switzerland.



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] flake8 setup
Local Time: October 15, 2016 9:51 AM
UTC Time: October 15, 2016 7:51 AM
From: jorge.mendesdejesus at wur.nl
To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>, pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>

Hi to all

I am in favor of a more a strict flake8 (part of travis). The added value is quality control and check that everything is being used (me forgetting unused variables and modules on the code)

+1
J.

________________________________________
From: pywps-dev <pywps-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
Sent: 14 October 2016 20:43
To: pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [Pywps-dev] flake8 setup

Hi all: FYI I've issued a PR in [1] which implements some flake8
checking as part of Travis checking.

What do devs think about adding flake8 checking as part of Travis
testing? Too strict? We can always run flake8 after (using Travis'
after_success hook), but then again there may not be much value
in doing so.

Thanks

..Tom

[1] https://github.com/geopython/pywps/pull/196
_______________________________________________
pywps-dev mailing list
pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
_______________________________________________
pywps-dev mailing list
pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pywps-dev/attachments/20161016/6b35687d/attachment.html>