[Pywps-dev] flake8 setup

[Tom Kralidis]

Thanks all.  FYI this has now been merged.

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Luí­s de Sousa
<luis.de.sousa at protonmail.ch> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I never used flake8 before. I will just trust your judgement on it.
>
> Luís
>
> Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Pywps-dev] flake8 setup
> Local Time: October 15, 2016 9:51 AM
> UTC Time: October 15, 2016 7:51 AM
> From: jorge.mendesdejesus at wur.nl
> To: Tom Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>, pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> <pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>
> Hi to all
>
> I am in favor of a more a strict flake8 (part of travis). The added value is
> quality control and check that everything is being used (me forgetting
> unused variables and modules on the code)
>
> +1
> J.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: pywps-dev <pywps-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf of Tom
> Kralidis <tomkralidis at gmail.com>
> Sent: 14 October 2016 20:43
> To: pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [Pywps-dev] flake8 setup
>
> Hi all: FYI I've issued a PR in [1] which implements some flake8
> checking as part of Travis checking.
>
> What do devs think about adding flake8 checking as part of Travis
> testing? Too strict? We can always run flake8 after (using Travis'
> after_success hook), but then again there may not be much value
> in doing so.
>
> Thanks
>
> ..Tom
>
> [1] https://github.com/geopython/pywps/pull/196
> _______________________________________________
> pywps-dev mailing list
> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
> _______________________________________________
> pywps-dev mailing list
> pywps-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pywps-dev
>
>