[QGIS-Developer] Split QGIS Server into it's own repo?

Nathan Woodrow madmanwoo at gmail.com
Mon May 22 06:49:25 PDT 2017


Ok that's all fine. Was just tabling the idea. Doesn't really affect me was
just an idea mainly.

Nathan

On Mon, 22 May 2017, 11:34 PM Neumann, Andreas <a.neumann at carto.net> wrote:

> I agree with most other responses. I would like to see QGIS server remain
> in the main repo. One of the reasons of the 3Liz refactoring is to remove
> redundant code from Server and rely more on the core parts of the QGIS API,
> to be better compatible.
>
> Andreas
>
> On 2017-05-22 15:26, Giovanni Manghi wrote:
>
> At the moment I think it would be best for QGIS Server to live in it's own
> repo mainly because it means the development process and cycle can be
> different to desktop if that is needed.
>
>
>
> That's exactly what I would *not* like to see.
>
>
>
> completely agree with Alessandro.
>
>
> cheers!
>
> -- G --
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20170522/6b2903f3/attachment.html>


More information about the QGIS-Developer mailing list