[QGIS-Developer] Post github issues migration clean ups - some proposals

[Denis Rouzaud]

Le dim. 26 mai 2019 à 21:38, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 11:43, Denis Rouzaud <denis.rouzaud at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1. But, we should indeed have a strict definition of when adding the
> milestone (someone is taking care of the fix or every time it's just
> considered as important). I'd rather keep milestones for PRs and maybe
> bring back the idea of "blocker" tag.
>
> I think it should only be defined by someone actually assigned to the
> bug. E.g. if I self-assign a bunch of bugs I'm actively working on,
> I'd like to be able to use milestones to self-manage these...
>

I see, I'm just afraid to see too many issues left-open with a past
milestone.
But we can give it a try I guess.


>
> Nyall
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> Nyall
> >>
> >> * Ideally, we'd block non-core-contributors from setting milestones
> >> for issues, to avoid reporters just tagging their issue with an
> >> upcoming milestone as a rude way of saying "fix my stuff for me"
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> >> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
> >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20190526/b54c56a3/attachment.html>