[QGIS-Developer] Funding and PR review

[Alexis R.L.]

Greeting Andreas,

Thanks for the reply, what I simply wanted to propose was to advertise in
some way how users and sustaining members would benefit from more funding.

If we could use standing issues and standing PR as showcases of how funds
could benefit the project, that might entice some to contribute.

I'm fully aware of the current review process and I think it's ok as it is.
The increased funding is a welcome news and hopefully it'll be sufficient
in the short term.

Thanks again!

Alex


Le mar. 4 janv. 2022 à 06:13, Andreas Neumann <andreas at qgis.org> a écrit :

> Hi Alex,
>
> Happy new year to you as well!
>
> We increased the funding for PR reviews from 10 to 14k.
>
> However, it is up to the reviewers (currently Nyall, Matthias and
> Alessandro, in the future probably also Martin) to decide what PRs they are
> looking at. I understand that the above figure doesn't guarantee that they
> can look at all PRs.
>
> My recommendation for new devs is to personally ask one of the above
> people - or another QGIS dev with core commiter rights.
>
> In general, for paid new developments, the developer who offers the new
> functionality should factor in the cost of code reviewing in the quote.
>
> For voluntary contributions it may be more difficult. There it probably
> depends a lot on the quality of the PR and the willingness of the dev to
> respond to the reviewers in a timely manner. And of course - if the PR is
> interesting to one of the reviewers, it increases the chance a lot.
>
> I am not sure if a separate crowd funding for PR reviewing would be the
> way to go. I would imagine it would be difficult to raise funds
> specifically for this goal. I would rather prefer to try to get more
> "sustaining members" in general, so we can increase this budget item in
> upcoming years.
>
> Let's see what other core devs and PSC members think abou this?
>
> Andreas
>
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 at 14:24, Alexis R.L. <alroyliz0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings Everyone,
>>
>> Some points have been going through my head and I was curious to know if
>> there could be good ideas in them for discussion and opportunities.
>>
>> One aspect that can irk new and existing contributors (or maybe just
>> myself) is when it comes to PR reviews. As some work on either side is done
>> on a voluntary basis we can't expect competent and overworked devs to want
>> and to dedicate more time on some work that won't benefit them.
>>
>> On the other hand we also get pr that get stuck or staled out.
>>
>> Now I was thinking of creating a crowdfund to raise some funds for
>> reviews ( I don't want to profit monetarily from any of my work). But I
>> don't want to be stuck managing funds and doing PR and etc.
>>
>> Now I know that QGIS has some devoted funds for bugfixing and PR reviews
>> to this effect. But I was curious to know if it would be a good idea to
>> advertise the work (possibly in the news feed?) that would benefit from
>> bugfixing or PR reviews.
>>
>> I'm not sure if dividing things and separating funds on a issue or
>> category (bugfix vs feature vs ?) would be beneficial. But showcasing what
>> they can gain from doing a contribution would probably be helpful rather
>> than giving for general support.
>>
>> Just my two cents, I also wish everyone a good new year of developping!
>>
>> Alex
>> _______________________________________________
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer at lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Andreas Neumann
> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20220104/941a2e42/attachment.html>