[Qgis-psc] Vote: QEP #7 - Composer to Layout rename

Nyall Dawson nyall.dawson at gmail.com
Sat Nov 15 12:43:16 PST 2014


On 16 November 2014 07:27, Tim Sutton <tim at kartoza.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Anita Graser <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
>>
>> +0 for a rename for 3.0
>>
>> because I would also prefer the term "layout" rather than
>> "composition" but I'm not sure that warrants having to deal with the
>> consequences, which are mentioned in the proposal.
>>
>> Anyway, as Jürgen wrote, I'd also like to see UI and API use consistent names.
>>
>
> From my side I guess I'd prefer not to have anything that results in us having side by side implementations and more V2 classes - I think it makes it very confusing to use the API. Also with regard to the proposed name changes, I am OK with them in concept but I think it would be better done in QGIS 3.0 to minimise churn for documentation and training material authors out there.
>
> So my apologies but for a 2.x release I think I am -1 on the proposed changes
>
> If you were to amend the proposal to state that changes would be effective of the 3.0 release it would be +1 from me.
>

Ok - done. I've updated the implementation section to explicitly state
that the rename will occur for 3.0.

Thanks for the feedback!

Nyall



More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list