[Qgis-psc] Moving to 3.0

Nyall Dawson nyall.dawson at gmail.com
Thu Feb 4 20:51:04 PST 2016


On 5 Feb 2016 12:01 AM, "Matthias Kuhn" <matthias at opengis.ch> wrote:
>
>
> My main requirements are:
>
>   * A bit of lead time (at least 4 months) before the last 2.x release
happens [1]
>   * No dual branch strategy: at a given time all new features shall be
targetted at the same subsequent version [2]
>   * More time for the 3.0 release [3]
>   * 3.0 will not be an LTR [4]

Same here, to all of this. There's one other thing I'd love to see:

* a firm plan decided and locked in BEFORE we release 2.14, so we can
communicate the future release plans as part of our 2.14 marketing.

Btw, thanks to the PSC for working through this. I understand it's not an
easy decision, with lots of ramifications and different parties to placate.
Big respect for the patience and tolerance you've all shown through this
difficult time.

Nyall

>
> Cheers
> Matthias
>
> [1] OTOH, an extra 2.x release can be discussed based on experiences down
the road
> [2] See Nathans comment above
> [3] Proposal 8 months
> [4] 3.2 or 3.4, please announce early (i.e. before 3.0 release) as
"planned as LTR" and at 3.0 release re-evaluate and tag one as "accepted
LTR"
>
> --
> Matthias Kuhn
> OPENGIS.ch - https://www.opengis.ch
> Spatial • (Q)GIS • PostGIS • Open Source
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20160205/03b789cd/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list