[Qgis-psc] Vote eligibility for QGIS Community Voters

[Nyall Dawson]

On 11 May 2016 at 16:27, DelazJ <delazj at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Agreed with Giovanni. And at the other side, there are people that have
> commit rights to repos that haven't contributed in the last years.
>
> @PSC, I'm not sure this campaign has got the expected result, given the
> remaining remarks/questions (there's a not answered afaik question of Nyall
> about how many persons can a person nominate).

I'm also wondering - do we need to nominate people who are already on
the PSC? Or is that redundant?

Nyall


>
> What about opening a wider discussion with the community to draft
> who/how/when, based on your first work ? Not only the process will be
> shared, built together but people will already be aware of this upcoming
> vote, will think about their potential nominee(s?), user group can have time
> to decide who they'll send (I suppose the place is not automatically for
> their chair and 7 days can be short for that).
>
> Regards,
> Harrissou
>
> 2016-05-09 10:47 GMT+02:00 Giovanni Manghi <giovanni.manghi at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Tim Sutton <tim at qgis.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi All
>> >
>> > I had a request from Saber to include the people registered on the hub
>> > into the list of people that are eligible to nominated QGIS Community Voting
>> > Members - are there any objections to that?
>>
>>
>> sorry for jumping in late in this discussion, I wasn't able to do it
>> before.
>>
>> I think that this proposal would be fair for the people that are most
>> committed in the bug tracker. For example: I have -of course- no
>> commit rights to the code (but have also some ~150 pull requests that
>> are processing related) and I don't usually translate (I'm not mother
>> tongue in the country where I live and work) but I consistently spend
>> a lot of time if filing tickets/reports, and most of them are the
>> result of testing (usually on multiple platforms, with multiple
>> versions installed) of new features/fixes rather than the result if
>> stumbling into in an issue. And like me of course there are others.
>> Can't speak for the others, but I definitely feel I'm part of the team
>> :)
>>
>> cheers!
>>
>> -- G --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc