[Qgis-psc] Performance tests QGIS Server

[Paul Blottiere]

Dear PSC,


>> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG would rent a dedicated server in our
>> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG would pay for the server.
> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
> further on this?


Doyou haveany news about the server?


Have a good day.

Paul




On 22/06/18 13:26, Paul Blottiere wrote:
> Hello PSC,
>
>
>> I would prefer, if QGIS.ORG would rent a dedicated server in our
>> Hetzner server infrastructure for this. QGIS.ORG would pay for the server.
> Good news, thank you for that! What information do you need to go
> further on this?
>
>
>> Also, the server rental is not really expensive for QGIS.ORG, but
>> finding a skilled sysadmin/dev to setup and maintain the system is
>> harder. Also, Richard and Jürgen do a lot of work on the QGIS.ORG
>> infrastructure - and I don't want to shovel even more work on their
>> shoulders
> I'm surely not as experienced as Richard or Jürgen, but I'm highly
> motivated to achieve this (if there's no objection of course).   
>
>
>> We can then discuss how much work this would mean for Oslandia and
>> what sponsoring level this would equate to.
>> we have discussed about trading work for sponsorship. IMHO this is a bit
>> of a grey area, as many of us already do unsexy, unpaid work.
> It's clearly a very sensitive question.
>
>
>> Yours is availabe now on:
>>
>> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
> Nice, thanks Yves! By the way, how do we proceed to sort/present reports
> from MS-Perf and reports from QGIS-Server-PerfSuite? Because I think we 
> should explain "somewhere" differences between these platforms to avoid
> some confusion.
>  
>
> Otherwise, to continue in this direction, I'll send a mail to the dev
> mailing list in order to get some feedback and opinions.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>  
>
> On 22/06/18 12:31, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
>> Hi Yves (cc to PSC),
>>
>> Ok, thanks!
>> Yours is availabe now on:
>>
>> http://tests.qgis.org/perf_test/summary_2018-06-20.html
>>
>> Would be nice if there was a summary_latest.html pointing to the actual
>> latest test.
>>
>> See: http://tests.qgis.org/
>> and
>> http://tests.qgis.org/ogc_cite/
>> I will add test.qgis.org to the https://certificate next round.
>>
>> Although... tests.qgis.org was a temporary solution, do others think it
>> earns a subdomain? Or should we point qgis.org/tests to it?
>>
>> My ideas is that somebody takes the lead on
>> - writing a page in the QGIS-Website about the purpose of these two
>> tests (ogc_cite) and (perf_test), and then point to the 'latest' of
>> both, and to the index of both dirs if people want to see older results.
>>
>> Volunteers?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Duivenvoorde
>>
>>
>> On 22-06-18 10:59, Yves Jacolin wrote:
>>> Richard,
>>>
>>> Done, I pushed a result made two days ago. Cron job is weekly (every
>>> saturday). I will push some report on monday by hand but will push every
>>> sunday via a cron job.
>>>
>>> We can of course run test on another server (QGIS server).
>>>
>>> If you think we need to change anything, let me know.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Y.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180709/ef3f321b/attachment.html>