[Qgis-psc] Discussion our financial situation

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi, 

The Windows CI thing would be worth-wile to invest it. But I think we
already had it in the past and because of a lot of problems (e.g.
timeouts when building, etc.) we stopped using it. I know that we
definitely paid for such a service in the past. It was called "Appveyor"
back then. Nyall might know more about it. I think he paid for it
upfront and then I reimbursed him. That was in 2016. 

I think we would first have to find a reliable solution for Windows CI
before investing into it. 

Andreas 

On 2019-11-14 08:51, Anita Graser wrote:

> Hi Andreas, 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:57 PM Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net> wrote: 
> 
>> Any ideas? Do we have useful and important work that could be finished 
>> until January for around 15k?
> 
>> Should we invest more QGIS bug fixing? Documentation (if we find one)? 
>> Our infrastructure? Or upstream qt5 improvements?
> 
> On the infrastructure side, there seems to be interest in Windows based CI. See current thread on [Qgis-psc] Direct push forbidden to master. However, I'm not 100% sure how this relates to a previous discussion from 2018 in the thread [QGIS-Developer] Windows compilation infrastructure. 
> 
> Regards, 
> Anita
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20191114/8bc6760b/attachment.html>