[Qgis-psc] AGM Voting matters arising

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi Marco,

Here is the link to the static PDF that you can link in the voting form:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ABPKd1ATdRruqRBj8jE-EIRlUcX8ls3P/view?usp=sharing

If it is accepted, I will copy it over into our website.

Thanks,
Andreas

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 12:32, Marco Bernasocchi <marco at qgis.org> wrote:

> Hi Andreas
>
> On 27.04.20 11:56, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I prefer to leave the current version. At one point we need clear
> > conditions, otherwise there will be endless discussions when a train
> > ride instead of a flight is reasonable or not. If we skip that section
> > altogether, then I'd rather have no text at all. It would be so vague,
> > that it doesn't really help, in my opinion.
> absolutely agree, I'd keep it like that.
> >
> > The list of carbon offset companies is not exclusive - I hope that
> > this is clear, and if other carbon offset companies are used, that's
> > fine - no need to revise the text. I heard rumors that certain
> > airlines will have a carbon-offset fee included in the airfare. If a
> > future plane ticket shows an extra item for a CO2 compensation, then I
> > don't think that there is a need for extra CO2 compensation.
>
> for my last flights on swiss they were already suggesting to compensate
> and giving a link to directly do it, I'd be good to have it mandatory
> but still already a step forward.
>
> >
> > I don't expect frequent adaptions are required to the current version.
> > What would have to change so often?
>
> I don't see that either. I think main point is having or not having such
> a policy.
>
> Cheers
>
> Marco
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > Am 27.04.20 um 11:41 schrieb Paolo Cavallini:
> >> Hi Andreas,
> >>
> >> Il 27/04/20 11:22, Andreas Neumann ha scritto:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> About environmental policy:
> >>>
> >>> the current version is at
> >>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CQ57w8jz_3MMW7ruIzaB30u4qUODHnoPTC9I7lSIuls/edit
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> There is one open comment by Vincent. Do you have any remarks on this
> >>> comment? If not, then I can generate a PDF version and we can link this
> >>> in the voting form - and if accepted - then create the website from the
> >>> text.
> >> I tend to agree with Vincent, but it's more of a practical issue than a
> >> blocker, so I happily leave the decision to you.
> >> Cheers.
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-psc mailing list
> > Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
> --
> Marco Bernasocchi
>
> QGIS.org Co-chair
> http://berna.io
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc



-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200427/ad5b21d4/attachment.html>